From the National Center for Policy analysis: www.ncpa.org.
WHERE DOES SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE WORK?
Two days after President Barack Obama told the American Medical Association that in some countries a single-payer health care system "works pretty well," the White House reaffirmed that people in those countries liked their health care, but also said it did not know to which countries the president was referring.
The criticism of single-payer health care -- primarily as practiced in Canada and Europe -- has been that operations and procedures are long-delayed or denied and health care is rationed to control costs. For example:
In Canada, the average wait for a 65-year-old man to get a hip replacement is six months, according to the Freedom Works Foundation.
The average wait time in a Canadian emergency room is 16 hours and 18 minutes.
Also, the average cancer test and radiation treatment cycles vary between 6 to 8 weeks, according to the foundation.
In Great Britain, at any one time, there are about a million people waiting to get into hospitals, according to John C. Goodman, president, CEO and Kellye Wright Fellow of the National Center for Policy Analysis.
Almost 900,000 Canadian patients are on the waiting list at any point in time, according to the Fraser Institute.
In New Zealand, 90,000 people are on the waiting lists, according to government figures.
"Those people constitute only about 1 to 2 percent of the population in those countries, but keep in mind that only about 15 percent of the population actually enters a hospital each year," says Goodman. "Many of the people waiting are waiting in pain. Many are risking their lives by waiting. And there is no market mechanism in these countries to get care to people who need it first."
Earlier this year, the Obama administration signed an economic recovery act into law that established a comparative effectiveness council to determine the most cost-effective medical procedures. This economic stimulus bill also included the establishment of a centrally linked electronic infrastructure that would include the medical information of every American by 2014.
Obama and most Democrats in Congress are pushing for a "public option," or government-run health insurance program that would compete with private health care companies.
Many analysts agree that the private, market-driven companies would be unable to compete with a government-run insurance program, which would have nearly unlimited resources.
Source: Fred Lucas, "White House Stands by Obama's Claim That Single-Payer Health Care Works In Other Countries -- It's Just Not Sure Which Countries Obama Meant," CNSNews.com, June 18, 2009.
For more on Health Issues:
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Single Payer Health Care
Posted by TartanMarine at 6:02 PM
Labels: NCPA, Single Payer Healthcare
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I lived in London for four years and my Sposue worked at Moorfields Eye Hospital as a NHS civil servant.ReplyDelete
Average wait for cataract surgery (20 minute procedure) was 18 months. Now, if you didn't mind paying 1500 British Pounds, you could be seen next Wednesday.
The wealthy will always have their care and the rest of us will have to be blind for a year and a half.
Socialized medicine means we all accept less care for the greater good.
I'd say you accept less care for a lot less money, money which could be used in other ways. The current US system spoiled all Americans to unbelievable measures. If you don't get silk pillows in your hospital room, the world will end. People don't realize how much money is wasted in this system. And it's a bit too much...ReplyDelete
Take care, Elli