Showing posts with label NCPA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NCPA. Show all posts

Thursday, July 19, 2012

Political Digest for July 19, 2012

The Old Jarhead Blog: Bringing you news and information the MSM is too busy covering American Idol, celebrity affairs and sensational missing person cases to cover. Please forward to friends who need to be informed.

I post articles because I think they are of interest. Doing so doesn’t mean that I necessarily agree (or disagree) with every—or any—opinion in the posted article, or that I was able to verify the information present, which is the responsibility of the author. In some cases I post things sent to me by readers I might not have posted on my own, to get ideas circulating.

Resources
For those who want further information about the topics covered in this blog, I recommend the following sites. I will add to this as I find additional good sources.

Book Recommendation: Southern Storm: Sherman's March to the Sea By Noah Andre Trudeau
A highly-recommended book for military history and Civil War buffs. This is a well-written, balanced account of this pivotal campaign, drawing on hundreds of primary sources, including numerous quotes from letters, journals and memoirs of soldiers on both sides, as well as southern civilians caught up in the whirlwind of war. With a masters in history and a long, though not exclusive interest in “the late unpleasantness,” I knew the broad outlines of Sherman’s march. But this book had extensive details I did not know, so I learned a great deal. I will look for more works by Trudeau as time permits.

Worth Reading: Who else, Mr. President? By John Kass
Excerpt: When President Barack Obama hauled off and slapped American small-business owners in the mouth the other day, I wanted to dream of my father. But I didn't have to close my eyes to see my dad. I could do it with my eyes open. All I had to do was think of the driveway of our home, and my dad's car gone before dawn, that old white Chrysler with a push-button transmission. It

Explosion targets Israeli tourists in Bulgaria
Excerpt: A bus carrying Israeli youth in a Bulgarian resort city exploded Wednesday, killing three people and wounding at least 20, police said. Witnesses told Israeli media that the huge blast occurred soon after someone boarded the vehicle. (Okay, call me Islamophobic, but I’m guessing the last thing these kids heard was “Allah Akbar!” ~Bob.)

Syrian state media: Defense minister killed in bombing in Damascus
Excerpt: Syrian state television said Wednesday that a bombing in Damascus killed Defense Minister Daoud Rajha, the latest and most dramatic sign of upheaval in more than 16 months of civil revolt. (There are no “good guys” in this conflict. Only the deluded think so. ~Bob.)

Excerpt: A lethal bomb attack in Damascus struck at the heart of President Bashar al-Assad’s inner circle Wednesday, killing at least three of his most senior aides, including his minister of defense and brother-in-law, in the most audacious challenge to Mr. Assad’s grip on power since the Syria uprising began 17 months ago.

US policymakers brace for potential 'collapse' in Syria
Excerpt: U.S. policymakers are bracing for a potential "collapse" of the power structure inside Syria, as the Obama administration closely monitors the intensifying violence in the capital. Following a bomb attack that left several Syrian regime officials dead, a State Department source forwarded to Fox News an assessment from an independent Middle East analyst who monitors social media in the region and provides occasional guidance to the department.

She will get the Cory-Booker-under-the-bus treatment for telling the truth. ~Bob. Excerpt: According to Connecticut Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro, however, the reason behind the swelling food stamp rolls is that unemployment is worse than the 8.2 percent reported earlier this month by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

If election were tomorrow, Obama would win. By Charles Krauthammer.
Excerpt: Krauthammer said that with the two-point lead President Barack Obama has over Mitt Romney in polling averages, winning in the Electoral College will be hard for the Republican nominee. “Because if you look at all the polls, the average is [that] you’ve got a two-point edge in the popular vote,” he continued. “It’s almost inconceivable that you would have that strong an excess in the overall vote and lose in the Electoral College.” (Actually, I think if you announced right now the election was tomorrow, 75% of Republicans would turn out, crawling over broken glass to vote, 50% of Democrats and 30% of “independents”—the ADD voters with lower information—would turn out. ~Bob.)

Plunge In CO2 Output Due To Natural Gas Fracking. By Merrill Matthews
Excerpt: The most underreported recent environmental story has been the dramatic decline in energy-related carbon emissions — nearly back to mid-1990s levels, and falling. Maybe it's because that story just doesn't fit the left's mantra that traditional energy sources are destroying the environment. The U.S. Energy Information Administration's (EIA) June energy report says that energy-related carbon dioxide fell to 5,473 million metric tons (MMT) in 2011. (Isn't this interesting! --Del)

A new measure of consumption inequality. By Kevin A. Hassett and Aparna Mathur
Excerpt: What matters for household well-being is consumption, since households are better able to smooth consumption rather than income over their lifetime. … Using these data, we find that consumption inequality has increased only marginally since the 1980s. Further, consumption inequality narrows in periods of recessions, such as during the 2007–2009 recession.

Prosecutors: Facebook video of teens' deadly attack was 'Knock 'Em Out' game: 62-year-old victim chosen at random in deadly game alleged assailants caught after uploading video of attack to Facebook
Excerpt: The game is called "Pick 'Em Out and Knock 'Em Out," according to prosecutors, and it's quick, violent and comes with just a few rules: Select an unsuspecting random victim in public and cold-cock him. Robbery is optional. … Delfino Mora, a father of 12, was collecting cans in an alley on the Far North Side when he was struck and fell hard on concrete. (No word if Obama thinks any of the killers could have looked like his son. ~Bob.)

Suspects Arrested After Church Youth Raped, Beaten, Robbed While Camping in Mexico
Excerpt: Suspects assumed to be gang members were arrested for the beating, robbing and raping of members of a church youth group attacked while camping in Mexico City last week. A group of 90 youth who were sponsored by the Chains of the Holy Trinity were attacked for hours at their spiritual retreat at Colibri Park outside of Mexico City last Thursday, according to The Associated Press.

Public-sector pensions. Burning fast: Despite many reforms, big problems persist in most states
Excerpt: RETIRED firemen and policemen began voting on June 19th on whether voluntarily to reduce their pension and health benefits to keep Providence, Rhode Island, out of bankruptcy. Providence, like many cities and states, is in a woeful condition. Its pension pot is only 32% funded, even on the highly optimistic assumptions about rates of return that are regrettably still standard for public-sector pension funds.

Excerpt: How many times have you heard that 26-year-olds can be covered by their parent’s health insurance as a result of health reform? Quite a few times I suspect. How about the fact that seniors can get free checkups? Yes, that too. How about the fact that health reform really isn’t paid for? That half the dollars needed to pay for it will require Medicare cuts so draconian that Congress is unlikely to ever let them take place? Hmm…You don’t remember reading about that? What about the fact that families at the same income level will get vastly different subsidies under the reform — differences that amount to $10,000 a year or more? Ahh…You didn’t read about that either? Here’s the problem. The first two facts — the ones you hear about often — are trivial. The second two facts — the ones you never hear about — are deadly serious.

Not political, but a great feel-good story. Glad he didn’t celebrate by spiking the kid. ~Bob.

I’ll Take a Mormon Over a Marxist Anyday!
Excerpt: When the former junior state senator from Chicago, one Barack Obama—a man no one knew diddly about—decided, “Hey, I’m gonna run for president!” people were eager to learn more about this promising upstart. Uncle Joe Biden was curious about Barack. Joe said at first blush that Obama seemed “clean” and “articulate,” which, I think, would be a hate crime if a conservative said that about him.

Obama Re-Election Means A 2nd Civil War
Excerpt: I just read historian Arthur Herman's essay arguing that America is on the brink of a second Civil War. "It's the Makers versus Takers", he says. Readers who regularly read my blog may remember that I offered the same argument in my blog of last year "The Second Civil War". As with Herman, I said the next Civil War will be an economic one, rather than a test of the legality of slavery. This war becomes even more inevitable as Obama amps up the race and class warfare strategy in order to win a second term and continue converting America to a socialist state.

The War On Women And Commonsense. By Burt Prelutsky
Excerpt: The one thing that must be said for Nancy Pelosi is that she is always good for a chuckle. Although she has been known to say some of the funniest lines ever heard in Congress, such as “You’ll have to pass ObamaCare in order to find out what’s in it,” she doesn’t have to rely on funny dialogue in order to have people rolling in the aisles. All she has to do is give us that famous Pelosi look, the one that resembles an elderly deer caught in the headlights, the eyebrows up around her hairline, with those startled eyes that, thanks to one too many facelifts, have lost the ability to blink.

Excerpt: Of all the people to not be beating up Mitt Romney for his present not quite stellar campaign, I find myself in that position. I’m genuinely not that worried. First of all, remember that most of his primary money is gone so he can’t spend on a fancy ad campaign right now. He can’t spend his general election money yet. Second, I like the aggressiveness over the past few days. (“Red States” is worth following. ~Bob.)

Worth Reading: How to spot a sociopath - 10 red flags that could save you from being swept under the influence of a charismatic nut job
Excerpt: One of the more offensive duties of being an investigative journalist is taking out the trash -- exposing liars, fraudsters, con artists and scammers for the people they truly are. Each time we investigate a sociopath, we find that they always have a little cult group following of spellbound worshippers who consider that particular sociopath to be a "guru" or "prophet." Sociopaths are masters at influence and deception. (I recommend the book Snakes is Suits. Psychologists estimate that 1% to 2% of the population may be sociopaths or psychopaths [the terms are often used interchangeable, but there are arguments about that.] Many are highly functional, not raving murders at all. I’ve dealt with a couple in my professional life, I think. Never easy. ~Bob.)

Worth Reading: Tyrants and Human Nature. By Walter E. Williams
Excerpt: Though a few liberals and progressives acknowledge the minimum wage law's negative effects on low-skilled workers, none acknowledges the law's racially discriminatory effects. If an employer must pay a minimum of $7.35 an hour to everyone he hires, the costs to discriminate in the employment of people whom he doesn't like are less. The minimum wage is so effective at promoting racial discrimination in employment that it was a major tool in the arsenal of South Africa's racists during its apartheid era. Racist unions were the country's major supporters of minimum wages for blacks.

Quote from The Patriot Post
When Obama gets heckled, the heckler is a racist. When Romney gets heckled, HE'S a racist. Keep it straight, cracker. –Daily Caller's Jim Treacher

U.S. busts $108 million black market in Medicaid drugs
Excerpt: Operators of a nationwide black market have illegally sold more than $100 million of expensive HIV medications and other drugs obtained from patients on the government-run Medicaid health insurance plan, U.S. authorities said on Tuesday.

Cronyism Built That: Dem donors rake in billions under Obama administration
Excerpt: President Obama’s record of rewarding political donors with taxpayer dollars and plum administration posts is facing a new round of scrutiny thanks to GOP challenger Mitt Romney’s effort to make it a central issue of the campaign. “[President Obama] thinks it’s his right to give taxpayer money to those who have supported him financially,” former Gov. John Sununu (R., N.H.) said Tuesday on a conference call hosted by the Romney campaign. “It’s insulting to hard-working entrepreneurs who really do create jobs.” (No surprise here. It’s The Chicago Way. ~Bob.)

The End of Welfare Reform As We Know It
Excerpt: The Obama Administration made yet another end run around Congress last week—this time, to gut the successful welfare reform law of 1996. If this is allowed to stand, it will mean rewinding years of progress that lifted millions out of poverty. (Poverty and government are not a side product of the Obama Agenda. They are the Obama Agenda. ~Bob.)

Where Did All The Money Go?
Great new ad from Team Romney.

Surveillance Vid Shows 71-Year-Old Concealed Carry Holder Opening Fire on Would-Be Robbers
Excerpt: Samuel Williams could soon become a poster child for concealed carry. Or rather a poster senior citizen. Williams is being hailed as a hero this week after he sprung into action on Friday to thwart an armed robbery at an internet cafe.

Tax Dollars Fund Most Illegal Immigrant Families. By Eric Odom http://www.libertynews.com/2012/07/16/tax-dollars-fund-most-illegal-immigrant-families/
For those of you who live with your head in the sand and can’t figure out why most Americans are upset over our illegal immigration, here is exhibit A. (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/04/most-illegal-immigrant-families-collect-welfare/) Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their American-born anchor babies. Even before the recession, immigrant households with children used welfare programs at consistently higher rates than natives, according to the extensive census data collected and analyzed by a nonpartisan Washington D.C. group dedicated to researching legal and illegal immigration in the U.S.

For the First Time, Canadians Now Richer Than Americans
Excerpt: For the first time in recent history, the average Canadian is richer than the average American, according to a report cited in Toronto's Globe and Mail. And not just by a little. Currently, the average Canadian household is more than $40,000 richer than the average American household. (America is on decline under Obama. Unless something changes just a matter of time before we lose super power status. Got to piggy back on Russians to go into space; 16 trillion dollar deficit; 14.9 unemployment factoring in those no longer looking for a job; 50 million on food stamps, and more applying for disability than hiring for jobs. We have left wing loons only focused on redistribution of wealth, and how Romney became wealthy as a venture capitalist. It seems our Nation has been dumbed down and/or wants big government to take care of them. Bottom line is we are heading toward economic collapse if Obama is re-elected. It may already be too late. --GBH.)

You didn’t build that
Funny stuff. ~Bob.

Spies, lies and the New York Times: Gray lady rivals Obama for truth-distorting agenda. By Col. Ken Allard
Excerpt: Nasty old colonels normally appear before Congress only to answer for past misdeeds. But I testified last week on Stuxnet and the White House leaks because of personal experience with something people in Washington often prefer to forget: The New York Times spies, lies and routinely distorts the truth.

Mitt Romney: 'I Vote for Freedom and Free People'
Another winning presentation, and hey, no teleprompter! –Del.

VIDEO: Allen West Releases New Ad Citing Background as High School Teacher. http://thehill.com/video/campaign/238613-rep-west-releases-new-ad-citing-background-as-high-school-teacher
Excerpt: Every child should have the equality of opportunity I did — the opportunity to live the American Dream."

Excerpt: James O’Keefe’s new Project Veritas video (see below) is a stunning exposé of union corruption surrounding so-called “shovel ready” jobs. In typically irreverent Project Veritas style, O’Keefe introduces a new company: Earth Supply and Renewal. What do they do? O’Keefe explains:

Thanks to Obamacare, Small Businesses Plan on Eliminating Jobs before 2014.
Excerpt: Obamacare’s employer mandate has small businesses scrambling to reduce their workforce in anticipation of the law’s implementation in 2014. Under the employer mandate, businesses with 50 or more full-time employees have to provide coverage or pay a $2,000 penalty for every worker minus the first 30.

Rob The Government, Help Government Motors!
Excerpt: Only in Obamaland….General Motors has announced a 60 day money back guarantee policy for all new Chevy models, including the Chevy Volt. The move sets up a scenario where purchasers can buy a Volt, claim the $7,500 federal tax credit (and most likely state credits) and return the vehicle for a refund within 60 days. Did GM really not consider this glitch, or is this just another way for Government Motors to prop up politically important Volt sales leading up to November elections? (Kinda reminds me of Obamacare. Instead of paying for an insurance policy to the tune of upwards of $10,000 per year, just pay the $2500 fine each year until you get sick, and then take advantage of the scam that allows you to buy cheap insurance even with a prior medical condition. There comes a point at which working really doesn't pay because the scams let you get by without it. We're close. No, on second thought, we're there! Just buy 3-4 Volts and return them within 60 days! Don Han)

DNC Head Gets Heckled At Synagogue Rally
Excerpt: The headline speaker was Democrat National Committee Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who represents Florida's 20th District in Congress. Unexpected heckling to her claims that the President was a strong supporter of Israel visibly upset and flustered her.

Business Community Fumes Over Obama ‘You Didn’t Build That’ Insult
Excerpt: President Barack Obama’s remarks in a Roanoke speech last week in which he tied the infrastructure of government to individual business success is drawing fire from business groups, who have joined Mitt Romney and conservatives in outrage over the remarks, Fox News reported.

Red Pill, Blue Pill. James Delingpole, Telegraph Blogs
Excerpt: In reality, economics is not the fiscal rocket-science you make it sound. Capitalism itself is based on good old-fashioned honesty. The money at the heart of it must be both an honest store-of-value and an efficient medium of exchange.

Obama’s South Side Chicago thuggery
Excerpt: Now that we know just what President Obama thinks of people who succeed in business, it is no wonder that the economy is so much in the crapper. In his desperation to avoid any discussion of his own disastrous handling of the economy, Mr. Obama announced last week what he thinks of the struggling spark plugs of commerce: They are a bunch of felons.

Arab apartheid
Israel is continually smeared with the false charge of apartheid by the Arab and Muslim world. For factual refutation of this canard, see http://ibloga.blogspot.com/2007/06/open-letter-to-anti-semite.html. If you want to see real apartheid today, take a trip to Beirut: http://4freedoms.ning.com/group/community/forum/topics/lebanon-islamic-apartheid-forbids-blacks-from-entering-swimming-p?commentId=3766518%3AComment%3A107357&xg_source=activity&groupId=3766518%3AGroup%3A95706 Once you have watched this disgusting display of racism of Arabs against an African woman, scroll down for an 8 minute audio lecture on the Muslim slave trade of Africans. This slave trade, that continues today after 14 centuries of Islam, was conducted mainly for sexual exploitation, and according to the lecturer, resulted in the killing of more than 100 million people. Cordially, Larry Greenberg

Federal Judge Imposes Racial Quota on FDNY, Responding to Minorities
Excerpt: A federal judge is ordering the New York City Fire Department to implement racial quotas to address grievances from minorities who failed entrance exams. (One hopes there will be a life-threatening fire at the judge’s home, so he can see if lower standards are a good thing for the people. ~Bob.)

Leakers should lose clearances for good
Excerpt: A North Carolina senator says he has a way to cut down on leaks about secret military or intelligence operations: Take away the leakers’ security clearances. Republican Sen. Richard Burr is sponsoring a bill, S 3367, that would prohibit security clearances from being renewed for anyone who publicly discloses covert actions. (And bar them from all government employment or contracts. ~Bob.)

The sinister campaign against circumcision. By Ed West
Excerpt: Not coming from [the Jewish] tradition I would never have a son circumcised, except out of medical necessity, and like most people of my background find the practice unusual. But it doesn’t take a giant leap of empathy to see that circumcision is a central part of Jewish identity and culture, and personally I like to think that my children and their children will continue my culture, traditions and religion; maybe even, God help them, my politics. And I come from an ethnic group that has not recently survived the worst genocide in history.
That's What They Want You To Think. By Steve Sailor
Excerpt: The flagrant stupidity of most conspiracy theories popular during my lifetime, as epitomized by [Oliver] Stone’s 1991 masterpiece/fiasco JFK (in which the entire military-industrial complex plots to murder John F. Kennedy by hiring some flaming French Quarter homosexuals), serves to inoculate the powerful against the suspicion that they have influence (or responsibility) regarding events. It wasn’t always like this. Until recently, it was widely understood that numerous turning points in history—such as the assassinations of Julius Caesar, Abraham Lincoln, and Archduke Franz Ferdinand—were the results of conspiracies.

Striking SEIU Workers Intentionally Endangered Connecticut Nursing Home Patients, Says Company. By Vince Cogliane
Excerpt: After the collapse of 17-month-long union negotiations on July 3, unionized health-care workers walked out of five nursing home facilities in Connecticut, but not before placing some elderly patients in dire medical risk through acts of sabotage, according to the company that owns and operates the facilities. (For unions, the ends justify the means, even dead old folks. ~Bob.)

Romney on Obama: ‘The only job he is interested in saving is his own.’ By Jamie Weinstein
Excerpt: Mitt Romney is slated to slam President Obama at a town hall event Wednesday afternoon for focusing on his re-election campaign instead of creating jobs, and for his recent comments suggesting American businessmen owe their success to the government.

Democrats Propose Plan to Sidestep Anti-Tax Pledge
Excerpt: Next week, Senate Democrats will push tax legislation that makes a significant concession to Republicans. It would secure Mr. Obama’s tax increases on the rich, but it would tax dividends and capital gains at a 20 percent rate for households that earn more than $250,000. The White House this year proposed allowing dividends to be taxed again at ordinary income rates, a plan that would increase tax rates on dividends to as high as 44.7 percent, from 15 percent, according to a new report by the accounting firm Ernst & Young.

Legal experts: YouTube’s removal of Romney ad may abuse ‘fair use’ law
Excerpt: A takedown request by BMG which led to YouTube’s removal of a Romney campaign ad might be an abuse of the law, legal experts told The Daily Caller Tuesday. The ad attacked President Obama’s history of giving major donors significant political appointments. It also featured an 8-second clip of the president singing the lyrics, “I’m so in love with you,” from the Al Green song “Let’s Stay Together.”

Group offers $100k for evidence Obama or senior White House aides knew about Fast and Furious. By Matthew Boyle
Excerpt: The Conservative Caucus ran an ad in the Washington Times on Wednesday, offering a $100,000 reward to any whistle-blower who comes forward with proof President Barack Obama or his senior White House aides knew about or approved Operation Fast and Furious. “Was Operation Fast & Furious simply a bungled attempt to capture Mexican drug lords, or was it an ‘under the radar’ political scheme hatched at the White House as now appears possible?” the group’s chairman Peter J. Thomas asked in a statement. The ad compares Fast and Furious to Watergate, and encourages whistle-blowers in possession of “verifiable evidence that President Obama or one of his aides knew about Operation Fast & Furious while it was underway” to turn it in “just like John Dean did.”

RNC calls for transparency on ‘political payoffs’ to Obama bundler Steve Westly. By Stephen Elliott
Excerpt: Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus released a statement Wednesday calling on the Obama administration to come clean on “political payoffs to Obama campaign bundler Steve Westly.” The statement claims the Energy Department gave out millions of dollars in loans to companies backed by Westly, Obama For America’s California co-chair in 2008 and managing partner at The Westly Group, an environmental venture capital firm. Westley has raised more than $1 million for the Obama campaign.

The Ultimate Takedown of Obama’s ‘You Didn’t Build That’ Speech
Excerpt: President Obama’s instantly infamous “You didn’t build that” speech is a major turning point of the 2012 election not because it was a gaffe but because it was an accurate and concise summary of core progressive fiscal dogma. It was also a political blunder of epic proportions because in his speech Obama unintentionally proved the conservatives’ case for limited government.

VIDEO: A Referendum on the European Union in the Netherlands. By Geert Wilders
Excerpt: A general election is coming up in the Netherlands on September 12. Geert Wilders' party, the Party for Freedom (Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) released the following campaign video today. Many thanks to Michael Laudahn for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

VIDEO: A Religion Gone Mad. Gates of Vienna
Excerpt: As we mentioned the other day, a street-preaching imam in Toronto has drawn attention to himself by asserting that sexual assault is caused by the failure of infidel women to cover up, rather than by the failure of (presumably Muslim) men to control their baser impulses.

UK: New Sunderland Mosque Sparks Widespread Complaints. Sunderland Echo
Excerpt: If the plans get the green light, they will involve the demolition of single-storey offices, the erection of parapet walls and two brick-faced columns. But many of the neighbours have objected because they believe it will result in an increase in noise and traffic. The application, which was submitted by the Pakistan Islamic Centre, has now drawn more than 1,000 comments on the council’s website.

The Olympic Spirit and the Islamic Spirit. By Daniel Greenfield
Excerpt: In a sign of the times, the London Summer Olympics will be defended by anti-aircraft guns and surface-to-air missiles… just as they were in Ancient Greece. G4S, the world’s largest security company, was to provide 12,000 security personnel, but has so far only managed to come up with 4,000. In another sign of the times, not all of their security personnel speak English.

London Mosque Appeal Refused
Excerpt: Whilst supporters of the mosque were busy labelling everyone who opposed it a racist, residents put forward serious and sensible concerns that parking would be a severe problem and that traffic and pedestrian safety would be compromised by creating a mosque in this location. The planning inspector duly supported this viewpoint, citing parking demand as ‘intense’. It was believed by residents that permission for this mosque was ‘a done deal’ due to Ms Shah’s close links to the Labour party and due to comments of support made by Labour councillors at the Revoe Area forum before the planning permission had even been considered.

Muslim Congressman: Islam in America Must Not Retreat. Assyrian International News
Excerpt: In a May 26 address before the Islamic Circle of North America/Muslim American Society (ICNA/MSA), both Muslim Brotherhood front groups, André Carson commiserated with his audience over how difficult things have been for them since the World Trade Center attacks at the hands of al Qaeda jihadists: "9/11 was tough on Muslims."

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Single Payer Health Care

From the National Center for Policy analysis: www.ncpa.org.

WHERE DOES SINGLE-PAYER HEALTH CARE WORK?

Two days after President Barack Obama told the American Medical Association that in some countries a single-payer health care system "works pretty well," the White House reaffirmed that people in those countries liked their health care, but also said it did not know to which countries the president was referring.

The criticism of single-payer health care -- primarily as practiced in Canada and Europe -- has been that operations and procedures are long-delayed or denied and health care is rationed to control costs. For example:

In Canada, the average wait for a 65-year-old man to get a hip replacement is six months, according to the Freedom Works Foundation.

The average wait time in a Canadian emergency room is 16 hours and 18 minutes.

Also, the average cancer test and radiation treatment cycles vary between 6 to 8 weeks, according to the foundation.

Meanwhile:

In Great Britain, at any one time, there are about a million people waiting to get into hospitals, according to John C. Goodman, president, CEO and Kellye Wright Fellow of the National Center for Policy Analysis.

Almost 900,000 Canadian patients are on the waiting list at any point in time, according to the Fraser Institute.

In New Zealand, 90,000 people are on the waiting lists, according to government figures.

"Those people constitute only about 1 to 2 percent of the population in those countries, but keep in mind that only about 15 percent of the population actually enters a hospital each year," says Goodman. "Many of the people waiting are waiting in pain. Many are risking their lives by waiting. And there is no market mechanism in these countries to get care to people who need it first."

Earlier this year, the Obama administration signed an economic recovery act into law that established a comparative effectiveness council to determine the most cost-effective medical procedures. This economic stimulus bill also included the establishment of a centrally linked electronic infrastructure that would include the medical information of every American by 2014.
Obama and most Democrats in Congress are pushing for a "public option," or government-run health insurance program that would compete with private health care companies.

Many analysts agree that the private, market-driven companies would be unable to compete with a government-run insurance program, which would have nearly unlimited resources.

Source: Fred Lucas, "White House Stands by Obama's Claim That Single-Payer Health Care Works In Other Countries -- It's Just Not Sure Which Countries Obama Meant," CNSNews.com, June 18, 2009.

For text:
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=49743

For more on Health Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=16

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

But is it over?

From the National Center for Policy Analysis, www.ncpa.org:

THE AGE OF MILTON FRIEDMAN

The last quarter century has witnessed remarkable progress of mankind, says economist Andrei Shleifer. The world's per capita inflation-adjusted income rose from $5,400 in 1980 to $8,500 in 2005. Schooling and life expectancy grew rapidly, while infant mortality and poverty fell just as fast. Compared to 1980, many more countries in the world are democratic today. The last quarter century also saw wide acceptance of free market policies in both rich and poor countries: from private ownership, to free trade, to responsible budgets, to lower taxes.

Three important events mark the beginning of this period. In 1979, Deng Xiao Ping started market reforms in China, which over the quarter century lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty. In the same year, Margaret Thatcher was elected Prime Minister in Britain, and initiated her radical reforms and a long period of growth. A year later, Ronald Reagan was elected President of the United States and also embraced free market policies. All three of these leaders professed inspiration from the work of Milton Friedman. It is natural, then, to refer to the last quarter century as the Age of Milton Friedman, says Shleifer.

Some of the central facts of economic and social development during 1980-2005:

During this period, world per capita income grew at about 2 percent per year, including rapid growth in East and South Asia.

Between 1980 and 2000, the share of the world's population living on less than $1 a day fell from 34.8 percent to 19 percent.

The World Bank forecasts that the number of people living on less than $1 a day will continue to fall sharply despite population growth, and account for 10 percent of the world's population by 2015.

What about economic policies?

The world median inflation rate in 1980 was 14.3 percent; by 2005 that median declined to 4.1 percent.

Top marginal income tax rates fell around the world from the population-weighted average of 65 percent in 1980 all the way down to 36.7 percent in 2005.

In the 1980s, most governments restricted foreign exchange transactions; by 2005 "black market" exchange rates have nearly vanished.

Tariff rates, which fell from the population-weighted world average of 43 parallel with vast expansion in world trade.

Over the last six years, the number of procedures an entrepreneur must follow before he can legally start a business declined, although East Asia and Latin America remain heavily overregulated.

Source: Andrei Shleifer, "The Age of Milton Friedman," Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47, No. 1, March 2009.

For text:
http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/shleifer/files/JEL_2009_final.pdf

For more on Economic Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=17

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Fleeing High Taxes

From the National Center for Policy Analysis. http://www.ncpa.org/.

SOAK THE RICH, LOSE THE RICH

With states facing nearly $100 billion in combined budget deficits this year, we're seeing more governors than ever proposing the Barack Obama solution to balancing the budget: Soak the rich, say Arthur Laffer, president of Laffer Associates, and Stephen Moore, senior economics writer for the Wall Street Journal.

For example:

Lawmakers in California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York and Oregon want to raise income tax rates on the top 1 percent or 2 percent or 5 percent of their citizens.

New Illinois Gov. Patrick Quinn wants a 50 percent increase in the income tax rate on the wealthy because this is the "fair" way to close his state's gaping deficit.

Here's the problem for states that want to pry more money out of the wallets of rich people. It never works because people, investment capital and businesses are mobile: They can leave tax-unfriendly states and move to tax-friendly states, say Laffer and Moore.

And the evidence discovered in Laffer and Moore's new study for the American Legislative Exchange Council, "Rich States, Poor States," published in March, shows that Americans are more sensitive to high taxes than ever before. The tax differential between low-tax and high-tax states is widening, meaning that a relocation from high-tax California or Ohio, to no-income tax Texas or Tennessee, is all the more financially profitable both in terms of lower tax bills and more job opportunities.

Updating some research from Richard Vedder of Ohio University, Laffer and Moore found:
From 1998 to 2007, more than 1,100 people every day including Sundays and holidays moved from the nine highest income-tax states such as California, New Jersey, New York and Ohio and relocated mostly to the nine tax-haven states with no income tax, including Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire and Texas.

Over these same years the no-income tax states created 89 percent more jobs and had 32 percent faster personal income growth than their high-tax counterparts.

Did the greater prosperity in low-tax states happen by chance? Is it coincidence that the two highest tax-rate states in the nation, California and New York, have the biggest fiscal holes to repair? No, say Laffer and Moore. Dozens of academic studies -- old and new -- have found clear and irrefutable statistical evidence that high state and local taxes repel jobs and businesses.

Source: Arthur Laffer and Stephen Moore, "Soak the Rich, Lose the Rich; Americans know how to use the moving van to escape high taxes," Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2009.

For text:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124260067214828295.html

For more on Taxes:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=20

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

THE REAL CULTURE WAR IS OVER CAPITALISM

From the National Center for Policy Analysis: http://www.ncpa.org/

There is a major cultural schism developing in America. The new divide centers on free enterprise -- the principle at the core of American culture, says Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute.

Despite President Barack Obama's early personal popularity, we can see the beginnings of this schism in the "tea parties" that have sprung up around the country. In these grass-roots protests, hundreds of thousands of ordinary Americans have joined together to make public their opposition to government deficits, unaccountable bureaucratic power, and a sense that the government is too willing to prop up those who engaged in corporate malfeasance and mortgage fraud.

The data support the protesters' concerns, says Brooks:

In "A New Era of Responsibility," the president's budget office reveals average deficits of 4.7 percent in the five years after this recession is over.

The Congressional Budget Office predicts $9.3 trillion in new debt over the coming decade.
Voices in the media, academia, and the government will dismiss them as a fringe movement -- maybe even dangerous extremists. In truth, free markets, limited government, and entrepreneurship are still a majoritarian taste, says Brooks:

In March 2009, the Pew Research Center asked people if we are better off "in a free market economy even though there may be severe ups and downs from time to time." Fully 70 percent agreed, versus 20 percent who disagreed.

Asked in a Rasmussen poll conducted this month to choose the better system between capitalism and socialism, 13 percent of respondents over 40 chose socialism; for those under 30, this percentage rose to 33 percent.

Republicans were 11 times more likely to prefer capitalism than socialism; Democrats were almost evenly split between the two systems.

The government has been abetting this trend for years by exempting an increasing number of Americans from federal taxation, says Brooks:

Adam Lerrick showed last year that the percentage of American adults who have no federal income-tax liability will rise to 49 percent from 40 percent under Obama's tax plan.
Another 11 percent will pay less than 5 percent of their income in federal income taxes and less than $1,000 in total.

Source: Arthur C. Brooks, "The Real Culture War Is Over Capitalism; Tea parties, 'ethical populism,' and the moral case against redistribution," Wall Street Journal, April 30, 2009.

For text:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124104689179070747.html

For more on Federal Spending & Budget Issues:
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=25

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

A Prescription for American Health Care

This is from Imprimis, a free monthly publication from Hillsdale College:

http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis.asp

I urge you to subscribe.


John C. Goodman, PhD.
President
National Center for Policy Analysis
www.ncpa.org
I also urge you to subscribe to NCPA's free e-newsletter

A Prescription for American Health Care

JOHN C. GOODMAN is the president, CEO, and Kellye Wright Fellow at the National Center for Policy Analysis. He received his Ph.D. in economics from Columbia University, and has taught and done research at Columbia University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Southern Methodist University and the University of Dallas. He writes regularly for such newspapers as the Wall Street Journal, USA Today, Investor's Business Daily and the Los Angeles Times, and is the author of nine books, including Patient Power: Solving America's Health Care Crisis andLives at Risk: Single-Payer National Health Insurance Around the World.

The following is adapted from a speech delivered in Naples, Florida, on February 18, 2009, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar.

I'll start with the bad news: When we get through the economic time that we're in right now, we're going to be confronted with an even bigger problem. The first of the Baby Boomers started signing up for early retirement under Social Security last year. Two years from now they will start signing up for Medicare. All told, 78 million people are going to stop working, stop paying taxes, stop paying into retirement programs, and start drawing benefits. The problem is, neither Social Security nor Medicare is ready for them. The federal government has made explicit and implicit promises to millions of people, but has put no money aside in order to keep those promises. Some of you may wonder where Bernie Madoff got the idea for his Ponzi scheme. Clearly he was studying federal entitlement policy.

Meanwhile, in the private sector, many employer-sponsored pension plans are not fully funded. Nor is the federal government insurance scheme behind those plans. We have a potential taxpayer liability of between 500 billion and one trillion dollars for those private pension plans, depending on the markets. And on top of that, roughly one-third of all Baby Boomers work for an employer who has promised post-retirement health care. As with the auto companies, almost none of that is funded either. Nor are most state and local post-retirement health benefit plans. Some California localities have already declared bankruptcy because of their employee retirement plans and the first of the Baby Boomers is still only 63 years old.

What all this means is that we're looking at a huge gap between what an entire generation thinks is going to happen during its retirement years and the funds that are there—or, more accurately, are not there—to make good on all those promises. Somebody is going to be really disappointed. Either the Baby Boomers are not going to have the retirement life that they expect or taxpayers are going to be hit with a tremendously huge bill. Or both.

The Mess We're In

How did this crisis come about? After all, the need to deal with risk is not a new human problem. From the beginning of time, people have faced the risks of growing old and outliving their assets, dying young without having provided for their dependents, becoming disabled and not being able to support themselves and their families, becoming ill and needing health care and not being able to afford it, or discovering that their skills are no longer needed in the job market. These risks are not new. What is new is how we deal with them.

Prior to the 20th century, we handled risks with the help of family and extended family. In the 19th century, by the time a child was nine years old, he was usually paying his own way in the household. In effect, children were their parents' retirement plan. But during the 20th century, families became smaller and more dispersed—thus less useful as insurance against risk. So people turned to government for help. In fact, the main reason why governments throughout the developed world have undergone such tremendous growth has been to insure middle class families against risks that they could not easily insure against on their own. This is why our government today is a major player in retirement, health care, disability and unemployment.

Government, however, has performed abysmally. It has spent money it doesn't have and made promises it can't keep, all on the backs of future taxpayers. The Trustees of Social Security estimate a current unfunded liability in excess of $100 trillion in 2009 dollars. This means that the federal government has promised more than $100 trillion over and above any taxes or premiums it expects to receive. In other words, for Social Security to be financially sound, the federal government should have $100 trillion—a sum of money six-and-a-half times the size of our entire economy—in the bank and earning interest right now. But it doesn't. And while many believe that Social Security represents our greatest entitlement problem, Medicare is six times larger in terms of unfunded obligations. These numbers are admittedly based on future projections. But consider the situation in this light: What if we asked the federal government to account for its obligations the same way the private sector is forced to account for its pensions? In other words, if the federal government suddenly closed down Social Security and Medicare, how much would be owed in terms of benefits already earned? The answer is $52 trillion, an amount several times the size of the U.S. economy.

What does this mean for the future? We know that Social Security and Medicare have been spending more than they are taking in for quite some time. As the Baby Boomers start retiring, this deficit is going to grow dramatically. In 2012, only three years from now, Social Security and Medicare will need one out of every ten general income tax dollars to make up for their combined deficits. By 2020—just eleven years down the road—the federal government will need one out of every four income tax dollars to pay for these programs. By 2030, the midpoint of the Baby Boomer retirement years, it will require one of every two income tax dollars. So it is clear that the federal government will be forced either to scale back everything else it's doing in a drastic way or raise taxes dramatically.

I have not even mentioned Medicaid, but it is almost as large a problem in this regard as Medicare. A recent forecast by the Congressional Budget Office—an economic forecasting agency that is controlled by the Democrats in Congress, not by some conservative private sector outfit—shows that Medicare and Medicaid alone are going to crowd out everything else the federal government is doing by mid-century. And that means everything—national defense, energy, education, the whole works. We'll only have health care. If, on the other hand, the government continues with everything else it is doing today and raises taxes to pay for Medicare and Medicaid, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that, by mid-century, a middle-income family will have to pay two-thirds of its income in taxes!

Cleaning Up the Mess

The only sensible alternative to relying on a welfare state to solve our health care needs is a renewed reliance on private sector institutions that utilize individual choice and free markets to insure against unforeseen contingencies. In the case of Medicare, our single largest health care problem, such a solution would need to do three things: liberate the patients, liberate the doctors, and pre-fund the system as we move through time.

By liberating the patients I mean giving them more control over their money—at a minimum, one-third of their Medicare dollars. Designate what the patient is able to pay for with this money, and then give him control over it. Based on our experience with health savings accounts, people who are managing their own money make radically different choices. They find ways to be far more prudent and economical in their consumption.

As for doctors, most people don't realize that they are trapped in a system where they have virtually no ability to re-price or re-package their services the way every other professional does. Medicare dictates what it will pay for, what it won't pay for, and the final price. One example of the many harmful effects of this system is the absence of telephone consultations. Almost no one talks to his or her doctor on the phone. Why? Because Medicare doesn't pay a doctor to talk to you on the phone. And private insurers, who tend to follow Medicare's lead, don't pay for phone consultations either. The same goes for e-mail: Only about two percent of patients and doctors e-mail each other—something that is normal in every other profession.

What about digitizing medical records? Doctors typically do not do this, which means that they can't make use of software that allows electronic prescriptions and makes it easier to detect dangerous drug interactions or mistaken dosages. Again, this is something that Medicare doesn't pay for. Likewise patient education: A great deal of medical care can be handled in the home without ever seeing a doctor or a nurse—e.g., the treatment of diabetes. But someone has to give patients the initial instruction, and Medicare doesn't pay for that.

If we want to move medicine into the 21st century, we have to give doctors and hospitals the freedom to re-price and re-package their services in ways that neither increase the cost to government nor decrease the quality of service to the patient.

In terms of quality, another obvious free market idea is to have warranties for surgery such as we have on cars, houses and appliances. Many are surprised to learn that about 17 percent of Medicare patients who enter a hospital re-enter within 30 days—usually because of a problem connected with the initial surgery—with the result that the typical hospital makes money on its mistakes. In order for a hospital to make money in a system based on warranties, it must lower its mistake rate. Again, the goal of our policy should be to generate a market in which doctors and hospitals compete with each other to improve quality and cut costs.

We won't be able to make any of this work in the long run, however, unless we pre-fund the system. Today's teenagers are unlikely to receive medical care during retirement if they must rely on future taxpayers, because taxpayers of the future are unlikely to be agreeable to living in poverty in order to pay their elders' medical bills. This means that everyone must start saving now for post-retirement health care. I would propose that everyone in the workforce put a minimum of four percent of his or her income—perhaps two percent from the employer and two percent from the employee—into a private account, invested in the marketplace, that would grow through time. These private accumulations would eventually replace taxpayer burdens.

In summary, if health care consumers are allowed to save and spend their own money, and if doctors are allowed to act like entrepreneurs—in other words, if we allow the market to work—there is every reason to believe that health care costs can be prevented from rising faster than our incomes.

The Market in Action

Let me offer a few examples of how the free market is already working on the fringes of health care. Cosmetic surgery is a market that acts like a real market—by which I mean that it is not covered by insurance, consumers can compare prices and services, and doctors can act as entrepreneurs. As a result, over the last 15 years, the real price of cosmetic surgery has gone down while that of almost every other kind of surgery has been rising faster than the Consumer Price Index—and even though the number of people getting cosmetic surgery has increased by five- or six-fold.

In Dallas there is an entrepreneurial health care provider with two million customers who pay a small fee each month for the ability to talk to a doctor on the telephone. Patients must have an electronic medical record, so that whichever doctor answers the phone can view the patient's electronic medical record and talk to the patient. This company is growing in large part because it provides a service that the traditional health care system can't provide. Likewise, walk-in clinics are becoming more numerous around the country. At most of these clinics a registered nurse sits in front of a computer terminal, the patient describes his symptoms, and the nurse types in the information and follows a computerized protocol. The patient's record is electronic, the nurse can prescribe electronically, and the patient sees the price in advance.

We're also seeing the rise of concierge doctors—doctors who don't want to deal with third-party insurers. When this idea started out in California, doctors were charging 10-15 thousand dollars per year. But the free market has worked and the price has come down radically. In Dallas, concierge doctors charge only $40 per employee per month. In return, the patient receives access to the doctor by phone and e-mail, and the doctor keeps electronic medical records, competes for business based on lowering time costs as well as money costs, and is willing to help with patient education.

Finally, consider the international market for what has become known as medical tourism. Hospitals in India, Singapore and Thailand are competing worldwide for patients. Of course, no one is going to get on a plane without some assurances of low cost and high quality—which means that, in order to attract patients, these hospitals have to publicize their error rates, their mortality rates for certain kinds of surgery, their infection rates, and so on. Their doctors are all board-certified in the United States, and they compete for patients in the same way producers and suppliers compete for clients in any other market. Most of their patients come from Europe, but the long-term threat to the American hospital system can't be denied. Leaving the country means leaving bureaucratic red tape behind and dealing instead with entrepreneurs who provide high-quality, low-cost medicine.

As these examples suggest, liberating the medical market by freeing doctors and patients is the only way to bring health care costs under control without sacrificing quality. Continuing on our current path—allowing health care costs to rise at twice the rate of income under the aegis of an unworkable government Ponzi scheme—is by comparison unreasonable.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

And you thought he was a Socialist!

From the National Center for Policy Analysis. I urge you to subscribe to their e-newsletter at www.ncpa.org.

OBAMA'S MOVES A STEP TOWARD FASCISM

U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner declared last week that some banks will receive huge amounts of new government Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) money even if they don't want it. President Obama, Geithner, et al. tell us they do not want to run companies. But when they fire chief executives, install new ones, remake boards of directors and force mergers, that is exactly what they are doing, says Steve Stanek, a research fellow with the Heartland Institute.

Geithner's announcement that his agency is conducting "stress tests" that could force banks to take more federal money comes just a week after leaders of the nation's largest banks met with Obama and told him they want to pay back the TARP money they have already received, not take more of it.

Last week, he announced he would decide, apparently with no firm guidelines, which companies -- including nonfinancial firms -- could pose "systemic risk" to the financial system; such a designation would give the government unprecedented powers to inject itself into any business it chooses, says Stanek.

All of us -- not just corporate executives and shareholders -- should be shocked and frightened by these actions, says Stanek:

The Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power to appropriate money, yet trillions of dollars have been spent, borrowed and committed in the form of various guarantees without congressional approval.

The Constitution also blocks the government from interfering in private contracts; various court rulings since the 1930s have weakened the protections, and now the executive branch is shredding them.

In addition to recent attacks on (admittedly unjustifiable) contractual bonuses at American International Group, the administration has recently moved to impose unjustifiable mortgage "cram downs" that require lenders to rework loans.

These recent actions amount to a fundamental move away from individual rights and toward state corporatism -- better known as fascism, says Stanek.

Source: Steve Stanek, "Obama's moves a step toward fascism," Chicago Sun-Times, April 4, 2009.

For text:

http://www.suntimes.com/news/otherviews/1510990,CST-EDT-open04c.article

For more on Economic Issues:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=17

Friday, March 20, 2009

Obama's Dilemma

This short piece is from the National center for Policy Analysis. Their free e-newsletter summarizes 5-6 interesting economic and health care articles daily. It's a great way to keep up, and a quick read. They are a free-market think tank. http://www.ncpa.org/.

WISHFUL AND DANGEROUS THINKING

President Obama faces a dilemma: to pay for his plans and get the deficit down to manageable levels, he would return top tax rates to where they were before the Bush tax cuts, extract more from the rich by capping their deductions, increase taxes on corporations and auction carbon-emission permits. At the same time, he promises permanent tax cuts for 95 percent of workers. President Obama's plan begins to fall apart under economic analysis, says the Economist.

President Obama's budget forecasts that the economy will shrink 1.2 percent this year then grow by an average of 4 percent over the following four years. These predictions may be exaggerated, explains the Economist:

The unprecedented damage to household balance sheets during the economic recession could well result in anemic economic growth for years, significantly undermining the president's revenue projections.

President Obama may either have to renege on his promise to slash the deficit to 3 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 2013 from more than 12 percent now, or rein in his spending promises or raise taxes more.

President Obama's scattershot tax increases are a poor substitute for the wholesale reform America's Byzantine tax code needs, says the Economist:

Limiting high earners' deductions for mortgage interest, local-government taxes and other things is certainly more efficient than raising their marginal tax rates even more, but it would be better to replace such deductions for everyone with targeted credits, abolish the alternative minimum tax, and implement a broad sales tax.

President Obama could simultaneously raise more revenue and make the tax code simpler and more conducive to growth; he is only asking the richest 2 percent of Americans to pay more taxes, building his change on shaky foundation.

Bush's tax cuts raised the proportion of American families that pay no federal income tax (or are net recipients of tax credits) from 33 percent to 38 percent; President Obama's will raise it to 44 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center, a research group.

Although many of these people pay payroll taxes, President Obama is also intent on reducing the link between payroll taxes and the pension and health-care benefits they were supposedly designed to pay for. It certainly makes sense to keep poor people off the income-tax rolls, but removing a sizeable chunk of the middle class weakens the political bond between taxpayer and government, and will lead to pressure for more such spending, says the Economist.

Source: Editorial, "Wishful and Dangerous Thinking," The Economist, March 7th, 2009.

For text:

http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?STORY_ID=13237211

For more on Taxes:

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_Category=20