How about a Bipartisan Treaty against the Criminalization of Elections?
com/2019/09/how-about-a- bipartisan-treaty-against-the- criminalization-of-elections/
Excerpt: Trump detractors hyper-focus on the president’s request that President Zelensky provide Attorney General Barr with any information Ukraine might have about Biden twisting arms to quash an investigation involving his son’s cashing in on dad’s influence. I say “hyper-focus” because there was a lot more to it than that. Long before the conversation came around to the Biden topic, the “favor” that Trump asked for was Zelensky’s assistance in Barr’s ongoing investigation of the genesis of the Trump-Russia investigation. No matter how much Democrats seek to discredit that probe and the AG overseeing it, it is a legitimate investigation conducted by the United States Department of Justice, which has prosecutors assigned and grand jury subpoena power. It is examining questionable Justice Department and FBI conduct. It is considering whether irregularities rise to the level of crimes. It will be essential to Congress’s consideration of whether laws need to be enacted or modified to insulate our election campaigns from politicized use of the government’s counterintelligence and law-enforcement powers. I mention all this because it is a commonplace for the government to seek assistance from foreign counterparts for ongoing federal investigations. (...) There is nothing wrong with our government’s requesting the assistance of foreign governments that have access to witnesses and evidence relevant to an ongoing Justice Department investigation. The president is the democratically elected, constitutionally empowered chief executive: There is nothing his subordinates may properly do that he may not do himself (it is his power that they exercise). And the president is never conflicted out of executive branch business due to his political interests. [Wow. McCarthy really cuts through the BS and cuts directly to the heart of the matter. He also cuts no slack for my former Governor. I highly recommend reading this piece. It's also rare that I get TWO Andy McCarthy articles this close together; I suspect he's irritated. I added emphasis to the central part of MccCarthy's argument. Ron P.]