Thursday, February 24, 2011

Political Digest for February 25, 2011

I post articles because I think they are of interest. Doing so doesn’t mean that I necessarily agree (or disagree) with every—or any—opinion in the posted article. Help your friends and relatives stay informed by passing the digest on.

Question of the Day
Which right-wing, violence-encouraging, tea party nut helped create a climate of violence by saying publically, ““I’m proud to be here with people who understand that it’s more than just sending an email to get you going. Every once and awhile you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary.” Sarah Palin? Glenn Beck? Rush Limbaugh? See the story linked further below for the answer.

Worth Hearing: Harvard's Niall Ferguson Schools Her on Muslim Brotherhood and Caliphate
MSNBC won’t have him back on the show anytime soon! Discomforts the Obot cheerleaders. ~Bob.

FBI Arrests Suspected Terror Plotter in Texas
Nothing to do with Islam, of course. It’s a “Religion of Peace.” Probably a crazed Presbyterian. Happens all the time. ~Bob. Excerpt: Federal agents arrested a Saudi student in Texas and charged him with attempting to construct improvised explosives and compiling a list of possible targets, including the home of former President George W. Bush. Khalid Ali-M Aldawsari, 20 years old, is charged in a federal criminal complaint with attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction. Mr. Aldawsari is in the U.S. on a 2008 student visa and is enrolled at South Plains College, near Lubbock, Texas.
Federal Bureau of Investigation agents have scrambled in recent weeks to determine whether Mr. Aldawsari has links to international terror groups and have found none, according to U.S. officials. The FBI alleges that electronic surveillance and searches of Mr. Aldawsari's apartment turned up Internet blog postings and a personal journal that expressed his desire for jihad and martyrdom.

Saudi College Student Khalid Alim M Aldawsari Accused of Plotting Bomb Attack on Home of George W. Bush
Excerpt: A notebook found in the suspect's Lubbock apartment indicated Aldawsari - who arrived legally in the U.S. three years ago - was plotting his personal jihad for years. "After mastering the English language, learning how to build explosives and continuous planning to target the infidel Americans, it is time for Jihad," he wrote in one entry. Aldawsari also maintained a blog where he expressed his desire to become a martyr for his anti-American cause. "You who created mankind ... make jihad easy for me only in your path," he wrote. The suspect e-mailed himself various targets considered for bombings, including the "Tyrant's House" - his code name for Bush's home in Dallas. That e-mail was sent Feb. 6. Another e-mail, titled "NICE TARGETS 01," listed a dozen reservoir dams in Colorado and California. And one of the notebook entries made it clear Aldawsari was bent on avenging U.S. involvement in Muslim nations.

Obama dispatches Clinton for talks on Libya
The full range of options: First he apologizes, then he bows and if that doesn’t work, out comes the dreaded Strongly Worded Note! Bob. Excerpt: President Barack Obama on Thursday condemned the violence in Libya as "outrageous and unacceptable" and said he was dispatching Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to Geneva on Monday for international talks aimed at stopping the violence. Obama said he was studying a "full range of options" to pressure Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's regime to halt attacks against Libyans as violent clashes spread throughout the North African country. He said the options included possible sanctions that the U.S. could take with its allies.

Gaddafi's son denies crackdown; loyalists reportedly continue attacks
Excerpt: Moammar Gaddafi's son denied Thursday that Libya has killed large numbers of protesters through airstrikes and other attacks, while a former top Gaddafi aide said he quit the government to protest its violent crackdown. Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, Gaddafi's son, disputed the death tolls that have been reported since the protests began 10 days ago, saying allegations that hundreds have been killed are a "joke." "Tripoli is quiet," he said in an interview aired on Libyan state television. "Life is normal." The junior Gaddafi said Libya intends to provide Western journalists on Friday access to Tripoli, the capital, and other cities, so they can corroborate the government's claim that the country remains under Gaddafi's control.

In eastern Libya, town keeps shaky hold after fighting off forces loyal to Gaddafi
Excerpt: The young men of this idyllic town nestled in the Green Mountain region of eastern Libya took control here in a days-long battle. First they fought their way into a security camp protected by 2,000 mercenaries and other forces loyal to the government of Moammar Gaddafi. Then they took over the streets. When Awad Mohammed's five sons joined the battle, he stood on the sidelines with his wife. He felt fear and pride. "They had nothing - just sticks, stones and bare chests. They took the guns from the mercenaries and used them against them," said Mohammed, an Arabic literature professor. "We never imagined the young people could do this. . . . I will die for them. These are all my sons." Now these sons of Baida - some just 13 and armed with rifles, rocket-propelled grenades and knives - man the lawless roads as they brace for the next possible attack. They are keenly aware that their leader of 41 years has shown no qualms about killing his own people.

Meet the Man Who Took Tobruk from Gaddafi
It remains to be seen if these are the forces of freedom—or of Islamist tyranny. If it wasn’t for wishful thinking, some folks would do no thinking at all. ~Bob. Excerpt: The city of Tobruk evokes memories of epic battles between the forces of utter totalitarianism and freedom from the previous century. Perhaps with some luck and fortitude, especially by younger Libyans, it might represent the same kind of victory for freedom in this century as well. Fox News correspondent David Lee Miller speaks with the young man who directed the liberation of Tobruk from forces loyal to dictator Moammar Gaddafi yesterday, Mahtoub Hussein Mahtoub:

In Libya, an al-Qaida Ally Lurks in the Shadows
Excerpt: The mounting violence in Libya could have the unintended consequence of reviving radical Islamists including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a terror organization aligned with al-Qaida. As Muammar Gaddafi's 41-year-old dictatorship totters on the brink, U.S. policymakers should pay close attention to reports that LIFG members are being released from Libyan jails, according to Jonathan Schanzer, a former Treasury Department official who monitors jihadist organizations. Until now, the LIFG has been essentially moribund inside Libya since Gaddafi's regime launched a repression campaign against it in the late 1990s. But last week, more than 100 members of the LIFG were reportedly set free under mysterious circumstances from a jail near Tripoli. It is unclear whether they were released by anti-government forces or by order of Gaddafi, whose government says it has freed close to 850 purportedly reformed jihadists from prison in recent years. Whatever the reason, news that LIFG members are getting out of jail is very troubling, according to Jonathan Schanzer, currently vice president of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. "Either way, what we're risking is a resuscitation of the LIFG," he said.

Libyan Rebels Vow Offensive as Gadhafi Blames Al Qaeda
Excerpt: Libya's antiregime forces promised to mount an offensive Thursday against the capital, Tripoli, as leader Moammar Gadhafi accused his opponents of being under the sway of al Qaeda. Speaking by telephone to state television, the increasingly isolated leader directed his 23-minute address to citizens of al-Zawiya, an industrial town just 30 miles west of Tripoli where gun battles raged Thursday. "What is this farce? You in al-Zawiya turn to [Osama] bin Laden?" he said. "He brainwashed your sons." Though pro-regime forces have largely kept protesters off Tripoli's streets, the violence flaring across towns in western Libya is cutting away at Col. Gadhafi's last remaining stronghold, and suggested his control over territory outside the capital was slipping. Until now, Libya's rebellion has centered mainly in the east, where whole sections of the army have defected to the opposition. But the fighting in al-Zawiya and other western coastal towns now pinions the longtime strongman between enemies on both sides.

Rough Waters Strand Americans in Libya
Excerpt: More than a hundred Americans seeking to flee the widening chaos in Libya remained stuck in the capital, Tripoli, on Thursday as high seas prevented an evacuation ferry from departing for Malta. Philip J. Crowley, the State Department spokesman, said Thursday afternoon that the ferry could leave “within hours” if the weather permits. An official with the ferry company, Virtu Ferries, said high winds had tossed up sea swells as high as 16 feet throughout the day on Thursday. The United States chartered the seagoing ferry — a high-speed tourist vessel with flat-screen televisions and a small casino — on Wednesday, after being turned down for permission to land a chartered plane in Tripoli. The American Embassy in Tripoli said on its Web site that it was in the process of chartering a flight from Tripoli for Friday. “We do not anticipate scheduling another charter flight after the charter on Friday,” the embassy said. The passengers are expected to remain on the 600-person ferry, which has been secured, until it departs and were being given food and water, Mr. Crowley said. There were 285 passengers on board, including 167 Americans.

Saudi Nukes: The Game Is On
Excerpt: Mideast Arms Race: If you think surprise upheavals of long-stable Islamic regimes are scary, how does a nuclearized Saudi Arabia courtesy of France grab you? The fallout from Iran's nuclear program is arriving. The kingdom of Saudi Arabia on Tuesday announced a deal with France to collaborate on the research, development and handling of nuclear materials — for peaceful purposes only, of course. Why would the world's biggest oil exporter, the country with the most reserves on the globe, be investing in nuclear energy of all things? The Saudis' official reason is that they wish to reduce their country's consumption of oil and gas in the coming decades, good enviro-conscious players on the world stage that they are. The truth, however, is that Saudi Arabia has been more than mildly interested in nuclear-weapons capability for a lot longer than most might realize. In 1988, Los Angeles Times reporter Jim Mann revealed that an obscure U.S. official whose job was to keep track of airstrip construction around the world had recently "looked at a reconnaissance photo of the Saudi Arabian desert and noticed something extraordinary about a newly constructed airfield" — that the Saudis were installing Chinese CSS-2 intermediate-range missiles, which are designed to carry atom bombs. With a range of about 1,500 miles, Saudi Arabia could use such rockets to attack Israel, India, Russia — or Iran. (OK, perfect, now more Middle East countries will be scrambling to get nukes, as was predicted long ago when it became clear that Iran was well on the path to getting them and it didn't seem anyone was going to take steps to stop them. Can't blame the Saudis or anyone else there for figuring they need their own nukes if they are to avoid being totally dominated by Iran. This proliferation was expected, and is the direct consequence of the inability of the West to do more than talk about working some kind of deal out with Iran. Again, we are living in a time as sad and dangerous as when the French and British watched the Nazis march into the Rhineland. We all know how that worked out finally... yet we have no leaders anywhere who have to vision and cujones to deal with the steadily growing threat. I'm starting to think seriously about that storehouse of canned goods, weapons, and ammo. Maybe the bomb shelter too....Del. I don’t think that a terrorist nuclear device eventually going off in an American city is inevitable, but I think it is more likely than not. ~Bob.)

Answer to “Question of the Day” above: New Tone: Democratic Congressman Urges Union Protesters to "Get Bloody" With Tea Partiers
Excerpt: This is not Capuano’s first brush with violent rhetoric. Last month Capuano said, “Politicians, I think are too bland today. I don’t know what they believe in. Nothing wrong with throwing a coffee cup at someone if you’re doing it for human rights.” I know it's a cliche, but it's too applicable not to reiterate: If, say, Sarah Palin had said anything remotely like this to a conservative audience post-Tucson, the MSM would be seized by fainting spells. Every television interview with Republican officials would begin with a "will you denounce Sarah Palin..." question. Paul Krugman and Frank Rich would pen hysterical columns denouncing Palin's bloodthirsty dog whistles. And, inevitably, many conservative politicians and pundits would distance themselves from the remarks. There are two sets of rules in this country, as established by Democrats and their media henchmen. If you're a liberal and you engage in violent or plainly hateful speech, you may have gotten a little carried away in your otherwise laudable and passionate participation in the political process. If you're a conservative who's attended a rally where someone else's protest sign may have strained the boundaries of good taste, you're tarred as an angry, racist extremist, bent on the violent overthrow of the US government. 

VIDEO: Morning Joe Deserves Credit
It’s notable that someone at MSNBC put it on the air, though it’s not surprising it was Joe and not any of their prime-time hosts. Recall that Rachel Maddow did a 7 minute segment on Tea Party signs last year. She was outraged about them, and about Palin’s crosshairs map. Not so much about these signs apparently. Still, Joe did show them and ask the right question when Carl Bernstein tried to change the topic. Kudos to Joe for that. Also, you have to give the panel credit for calling this what it is: Liberal Media Bias. I haven’t checked MRC to see if Joe was accurate, but if no network has shown these signs that’s truly outrageous. {Are the media beginning to wonder on which side their bread is buttered? Wheat and chaff, dude, wheat and chaff. They are separating themselves.- Kate}

Wisconsin's 'Anti-Union' Hysteria
The Mayor of our small city in Illinois—a Union employee and Daley sycophant—having solved all our problems, found time to go off to Madison to join the protest. He bragged in the paper that he was offering his couch to the hide-out Democrats shirking their sworn duty. Perhaps the Wisconsin taxpayers would pay Illinois to keep them here? I’d certainly pay if Wisconsin were to take our Democrat legislators. ~Bob. Excerpt: The Wisconsin protests are proving that the era of unhinged politics is not over. If anything, the hyperpartisan hysteria seems to be catching, with Democratic lawmakers in Indiana running for the hills while a new round of union protests swamps the statehouse in Ohio. It’s an unwelcome recurrence of politics being treated as apocalypse. Neither side is innocent, but on matters of both style and substance, the left is coming out of this debate looking worse. We’ve certainly seen a full range of left-wing-nuttery at the protests, from the obligatory Nazi/Hitler comparisons on signs to Democratic elected officials getting into the overheated action. Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA) declared his solidarity with the mob, saying “every once in a while you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary,” while the esteemed Rep. John Lewis (D-GA) said, “There is an unbelievable parallel and a real connection that I can readily identify with the people in the streets of Cairo and Madison, Wisconsin.” Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) just cut to the chase and called Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker a “dictator.”

The Petulant Child Form of Democracy
Excerpt: In a word, the Great Symbiosis between government workers and the government is unraveling. For decades, government workers at all levels — teachers, clerks and other bureaucrats, police and firemen — have extracted unsustainable promises from the politicians their unions have elected. The politicians, in turn, have gladly helped themselves to more and more of your money in order to reward their real constituents — not the public, which only furnishes the money, but the unions, which consume it. This corrupt and unsustainable pas de deux has continued for as long as it did only because the mighty engine of American capitalism managed, despite the best efforts of the Left to hobble it, to furnish a dynamic and growing economy. We see now how much of that economic vibrancy was based on the seductive illusion of debt.

ObamaCare ruling: Commerce Clause now reaches “mental activity”
I think, therefore I am regulated by the Commerce Clause. ~Bob. Excerpt: Another federal judge has found for the Constitutionality of the individual mandate. But if ever you’ve wondered what tortured logic looks like (made in an effort to justify something that just doesn’t fit) then you’ll be amazed to read the following from the ruling: As previous Commerce Clause cases have all involved physical activity, as opposed to mental activity, i.e. decision-making, there is little judicial guidance on whether the latter falls within Congress’s power….However, this Court finds the distinction, which Plaintiffs rely on heavily, to be of little significance. It is pure semantics to argue that an individual who makes a choice to forgo health insurance is not “acting,” especially given the serious economic and health-related consequences to every individual of that choice. Making a choice is an affirmative action, whether one decides to do something or not do something. They are two sides of the same coin. To pretend otherwise is to ignore reality. [emphasis added]

Post Traumatic American Syndrome
Excerpt: I have noticed fewer people around town this past weekend. First I thought it was because of the Presidents Day holiday. Then I realized it was because anarchists were being bused into Wisconsin! More for them, and fewer for us! The Midwest is getting a bit of a taste of Berkeley life. I'm guessing they are not liking it one bit. The violent, hostile vibe wouldn't sit well with decent Midwestern folks. Of course, around Berkeley, riots are nothing new; there are street uprisings whenever the spirit moves people. On
Telegraph Avenue
, the poor merchants have endured impromptu mayhem for decades. I say "poor" merchants for a reason: most of them are struggling, and, if you've visited the area recently, you'll find that a number of storekeepers have packed up and moved on. When the infamous BART police shooting occurred a few years ago, there was lawlessness all over downtown Oakland. Cars were destroyed, stores ransacked and looted, and people were injured. Of course, many joined in who weren't motivated by righteous indignation, but by the promise of free jewelry and clothes.

The Laws
A fun site with a lot of truth.

The Gratitude Campaign
Or you could just say, “Thank you for your service.” ~Bob.

Under kidney transplant proposal, younger patients would get the best organs
As an old guy with IPF, wonder what this might mean for lung transplants in the future. Current rule is you have to be within a year of dying, but healthy enough that they think you will survive the transplant. ~Bob. Excerpt: The nation's organ-transplant network is considering giving younger, healthier people preference over older, sicker patients for the best kidneys.

Saving our nation from debt
Excerpt: Uncle Sam is spending you into the poorhouse. Taxes, inflation, unemployment, interest rates – all could skyrocket if Washington keeps spending trillions of dollars it doesn't have. Unless we begin to cut spending now (a lot of spending) these four horsemen of debt will ride roughshod over families and businesses already struggling to get by. Fortunately, we still have a chance to kick the spending addiction and keep the American Dream alive.

Assange must be extradited, judge rules
Excerpt: Britain will honor Sweden's request to extradite WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange to face sex-crime allegations, a British judge ruled Thursday. Speaking to a packed courtroom in southeast London, Judge Howard Riddle said Swedish prosecutors' request that Assange be forced to return to Stockholm was valid and dismissed arguments that extradition would violate the 39-year-old Australian's human rights.

Liberals to stage Tea Party-like revolts against GOP spending cuts
Let’s make up some signs for them: “Print More Money!” “Screw the Grandkids—let them pay more for our spending.” ~Bob. Excerpt: Democratic strategists believe their Tea Party moment has arrived. Working with labor unions and liberal groups, they are using the Presidents Day congressional recess to organize a public backlash against billions of dollars in cuts to federal programs. One labor organizer said that members have been urged to attend congressional town hall meetings to ask Republican lawmakers “pointed questions” about the cuts they supported last week. “We are targeting various House Republicans in town hall meetings during the recess to let them know these budget cuts are beyond the pale,” said the labor source, who added that it has been difficult to mobilize supporters to public question-and-answer sessions with lawmakers because “they’ve been pretty circumspect in giving out information about the meetings.”

Town hall 'rage' over spending
Excerpt: The two town halls couldn’t have been any more different — one a blue-jeans-and-ball-cap affair, rowdy and filled-to-capacity near an impoverished urban strip — the other a smaller confab of polo-shirt-and-Bermuda-shorts clad seniors in a sleek conference room outside Orlando. But one sentiment resonated through both Rep. Allen West’s Pompano Beach gathering in south Florida and Rep. Dan Webster’s in Winter Garden: voters are still angry, they still don’t trust Washington, and they’re saying, “hell yeah, shut down the government if you have to.” Webster, who preferred his constituents sound off on their opinions rather than ask questions, heard it this way: “If we have to shut the government down, don’t believe those polls you get out of the media. The people are behind you.” West, who entertained questions from a long line of voters, had this takeaway message from his constituents: “There’s a very good possibility that government will shut down. I know the Democrats have their talking points lined up. They’ll blame us for everything. What will we do?”

Where Will New Revenues for Deficit Reduction Come From?
Excerpt: If Washington is going to need new tax revenues to bring the deficit under control—which it inevitably will– I increasingly wonder where the cash is going to come from. If you listen to what President Obama has been saying in recent days, it appears that while corporations and nearly all individuals and families would avoid any tax hit at all, a handful of high-income households would get socked with major increases. These tax hikes would be so big, in fact, that top-bracket taxpayers might end up paying a rate of 67 percent on ordinary income and nearly 50 percent on capital gains. Since proposing his 2012 budget, the president has laid out three goals: He wants to reform the corporate income tax, but in a way that raises no more money than the current code. He’s repeated his long-standing vow to never raise taxes on individuals making $200,000 or less (or couples up to $250,000). Thus, he’d exempt 96.5 percent of households from any tax hikes. And despite those self-imposed constraints, he also wants to dramatically reduce the long-term deficit. As a result, a relative handful of individuals and families (fewer than 6 million) would foot the entire revenue bill for deficit reduction. The pain of spending cuts would be distributed very differently, of course. How big would these tax hikes have to be?

Internet Cop: President Obama’s top man at the Federal Communications Commission tries to regulate the Net.
Excerpt: Robert McDowell becomes effusive when talking about the World Wide Web. “The beauty of the Internet is that it has been somewhat lawless,” says the Republican, one of five appointees who run the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The lack of government mandates, McDowell says, has made the Net “the greatest deregulatory success story of all time,” a “sort of libertarian heaven.” Is that heaven about to crash down to earth? Julius Genachowski, the man hand-picked by President Barack Obama to chair the FCC, insists not. “I’ve been clear repeatedly that we’re not going to regulate the Internet,” he told The Wall Street Journal in February 2010. But his actions suggest otherwise. Since taking office in June 2009, Genachowski, a tech entrepreneur and former FCC counsel, has led the commission on an unprecedented quest for power over the Web’s network infrastructure, sparking a thunderous, confusing lobbying battle over who gets to control the Net. “If the government starts to get involved with regulation of Internet network management,” McDowell warns, “you’ll start to see the politicization of decisions in that realm.” At this point, there’s no if about it: From his first major speech to a hurried and secretive rulemaking procedure in the final weeks of 2010, Genachowski has made it his mission to plant the seeds of government control within the core of the Internet—all under the guise of “preserving Internet freedom.”

The Efficiency Costs of Tax-Financed Health Improvements
Excerpt: The fraction of gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to health care in the United States is the highest in the world and rising rapidly. Recent economic studies have highlighted the growing value of health improvements, but less attention has been paid to the efficiency costs of tax-financed spending to pay for such improvements. In a new study, Katherine Baicker and Jonathan Skinner use a life cycle model of labor supply, saving and longevity improvement to measure the balanced-budget impact of continued growth in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. The model predicts that top marginal tax rates could rise to 70 percent by 2060, depending on the progressivity of future tax changes. The deadweight loss of the tax system is greater when the financing is more progressive. If the share of taxes paid by high-income taxpayers remains the same, the efficiency cost of raising the revenue needed to finance the additional health spending is $1.48 per dollar of revenue collected, and GDP declines (relative to trend) by 11 percent. A proportional payroll tax has a lower efficiency cost (41 cents per dollar of revenue averaged over all tax hikes, a 5 percent drop in GDP) but more than doubles the share of the tax burden borne by lower income taxpayers. (This is economist speak for, “we’re screwed.” ~Bob.)

It's Time for Washington to Get Serious About Job Creation
Excerpt: In recent weeks Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke has repeatedly expressed worry about the state of the U.S. job market. His concerns are well founded. Simply put, the last jobs report was dismal. Consensus forecasts of 148,000 new jobs collided with a reality of 36,000 new jobs. The unemployment rate fell only because half a million discouraged workers stopped looking for jobs and left the labor force. The labor-force participation rate of 64.2% is the lowest it's been since 1984, and the employment to population ratio - at 58.4% - is the lowest it's been since 1983. Total employment in January 2011 was 139,323 million, which means 555,000 fewer workers had jobs than in June 2009, when the National Bureau of Economic Research deemed the recession over.

Nevada prostitutes, brothel owners say they’re not afraid of Harry Reid
Excerpt: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s threat to shut down the regulated sex industry in his state doesn’t exactly have Nevada prostitutes shaking in their G-strings. “I will lie down for a lot of things, but Senator Reid is not one of them,” said Brooke Taylor, a five-year veteran working girl at the Moonlite Bunny Ranch just outside Carson City. (It seems not ALL the voters are willing to be screwed by Democrats, not even for money. Ron P.

Electric Cars – it’s all about the battery
Excerpt: I own an electric car (on my second one now) that I use for around town. It’s fine for short jaunts, which is the majority of driving. However the limiting factor is of course the battery and the range associated with it. While I can get about 40 miles of city driving, I could probably double that with a lighter, more efficient battery. While I know some people pooh-pooh electric cars, I think mine is rather fun. With gas prices headed toward $5 a gallon, I’ll have even more fun. (...) Scientists are reporting development of an advanced lithium-ion battery that is ideal for powering the electric vehicles now making their way into dealer showrooms. The new battery can store large amounts of energy in a small space and has a high rate capacity, meaning it can provide current even in extreme temperatures. A report on this innovation appears in ACS’ Journal of the American Chemical Society. (Unusually for WUWT, the majority of the 200-odd comments are unflattering to this concept. One from ew-3 stands out: “Have spent several years working with Li-Ion batteries in portable GPS devices. Virtually all Li-Ion batteries are made in China. Not so much for the labor cost, but because of the EPA. Making these batteries is a major environmental disaster. And mining the raw materials is also a problem.” It seems electric cars aren’t a quick, easy fix. --Ron P. Since most electricity is generated by burning coal, these should be properly called “Coal-Powered Cars. ~Bob.)

Will Harry Reid Also Hide in Illinois?
Excerpt: Over the past week the nation witnessed the spectacle of Wisconsin and Indiana Democrat lawmakers fleeing across state-lines into Illinois, Bonnie and Clyde-style, though in this case in hopes that their absence would stave off having to make tough decisions. Back home, their votes were needed to rescue their states from dire fiscal problems, and that is the case in states across the rest of the Midwest and the rest of the nation. Budget deficits are bulging and competition for scarce financial resources is growing more alarming. This Prohibition-era retro replay may indeed spread to the federal government and Washington, as a new Congress grapples with its first tough budget debate. Will liberals duck responsibility again?

Insanity and Chutzpah
Statement from Somali pirate spokesman Abdirahman Abdullahi Qabowsade in regard to the recent murder of 4 Americans and the taking prisoner of the surviving pirates-- "We have been killed and arrested illegally before, so we can't bear with such attacks anymore. We will respond to any future attacks aggressively." (See full article about what the pirates are doing and threatening now) http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110223/ap_on_re_us/piracy
The murderous criminal gang pirates are complaining about being "killed and arrested illegally"??? This has got to be a new record for insane, idiotic, nonsense propaganda statements. It's like the sniper serial killer wanting to sue the police for the bodily harm he suffered when they shot him to stop his killing spree. Now the pirates are deliberately mistreating their hostages, and threatening wholesale slaughter of them if anyone comes after them. This is the final result of the utter, gutless folly of Western nations in not reacting a very long time ago to piracy on the high seas the way it was dealt with in the past. Now all that's happened is that the price of ransoming has gone way up, and the hostages are in far more danger than they were before, and there will be no way to stop the pirates now without the near certainty of hostages being killed. The answer? Well, the only one I can think of is a 3AM sweep of a large commando force into the area of the land where all the pirates are to be found, while jamming any forms of communication out to the hostage ships. To take as many pirate leaders prisoner as possible, and then to have them contact the ships and tell their men to surrender. And if that takes "convincing" the leaders to make those calls, do whatever it takes to motivate them. And promise the men on the ships that if any hostages are harmed, every single man on the ships will die, along with whatever friends and relatives of theirs that were taken prisoner. Yeah, I know. We'd never do that in a million years. So let's pay the Russians or the South Koreans to do it. They won't hesitate, and they have well trained commando forces. Or maybe the French Foreign Legion. Whoever has the capability in terms of men and equipment, and is not afraid to take "harsh measures". The alternate, to continue on tiptoeing around these people, is just beyond stupidity, and guaranteed to come out badly in any case. –Del)

Dealing with Pirates
My take from back in 2008. The four Americans just killed would still be alive if we’d had the courage to deal with the problem. ~Bob.

Pirates add ammo, men to ships after 4 US deaths
In my book, they should have already been tried, executed and buried at sea. ~Bob. Excerpt: Pirates in Somalia said Wednesday they are ferrying ammunition and men to the 30 hijacked vessels still under their control, and they threatened to kill more captives following the violent end to a hostage standoff that left four Americans dead. The U.S. military said that 15 pirates detained after the Americans were slain Tuesday could face trial in the United States. The military, FBI and Justice Department are working on the next steps for those pirates, said Bob Prucha, a spokesman for U.S. Central Command in Florida. The Somalis are currently being held on the aircraft carrier USS Enterprise, which is in the waters off East Africa. A pirate aboard the hijacked yacht Quest on Tuesday fired a rocket-propelled grenade at a U.S. warship that had responded to last Friday's hijacking. Then gunfire broke out aboard the yacht. When Navy special forces reached the Quest, they found the four American hostages had been shot and killed.

Obama's mystery links to Gadhafi uncovered
Excerpt: As pressure mounts on the White House to intervene to stop Moammar Gadhafi's bloody crackdown in Libya, many commentators have been wondering why Barack Obama has been cautious in his criticism of the dictator after the U.S. president so fervently supported the removal from office of U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak of Egypt. But Gadhafi has been tied to Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama's spiritual adviser for more than 23 years. The Libyan dictator also has financed and strongly supported the Nation of Islam and its leader, Louis Farrakhan. Obama has ties to Farrakhan and his controversial group.

"Intolerable" Bed-Blocking Crisis Threatens British National Health Service
Excerpt: The NHS faces an "intolerable" bed-blocking crisis as funding cuts lead to half of its wards being filled by elderly people who should be in care homes, a report warns today.

Democracy Versus Liberty
Excerpt: To highlight the offensiveness to liberty that democracy and majority rule is, just ask yourself how many decisions in your life would you like to be made democratically. How about what car you drive, where you live, whom you marry, whether you have turkey or ham for Thanksgiving dinner? If those decisions were made through a democratic process, the average person would see it as tyranny and not personal liberty. Is it no less tyranny for the democratic process to determine whether you purchase health insurance or set aside money for retirement? Both for ourselves, and our fellow man around the globe, we should be advocating liberty, not the democracy that we've become where a roguish Congress does anything upon which they can muster a majority vote.

Lobbyists: White House sends meetings off-site to hide them
So much for BO’s solemn pledge of transparency—not that intelligent folks believed that mush. ~Bob. Excerpt: Caught between their boss’ anti-lobbyist rhetoric and the reality of governing, President Barack Obama’s aides often steer meetings with lobbyists to a complex just off the White House grounds — and several of the lobbyists involved say they believe the choice of venue is no accident. It allows the Obama administration to keep these lobbyist meetings shielded from public view — and out of Secret Service logs kept on visitors to the White House and later released to the public. “They’re doing it on the side. It’s better than nothing,” said immigration reform lobbyist Tamar Jacoby, who has attended meetings at the nearby Jackson Place complex and believes the undisclosed gatherings are better than none. The White House scoffs at the notion of an ulterior motive for scheduling meetings in what are, after all, meeting rooms. But at least four lobbyists who’ve been to the conference rooms just off Lafayette Square tell POLITICO they had the distinct impression they were being shunted off to Jackson Place — and off the books — so their visits wouldn’t later be made public.

Huck trashes 'RomneyCare' in book
Excerpt: In his new book, Mike Huckabee trashes “RomneyCare” – saying it’s “socialized medicine” that has exploded costs, worsened care for patients, and proves why President Obama’s unpopular health care reform won't work. In a chapter in "A Simple Government," Huckabee uses Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts health care program to bolster his arguments against Obama's reforms, yoking the two tightly together.

A president of misrule
Excerpt: President Obama established a bipartisan debt-reduction com mission -- and then ignored its findings, which called for unpopular cuts in entitlements and spending. His first two budgets led to the largest deficits in US history. The ensuing $3 trillion in red ink prompted the Tea Party movement and led to the Democrats' largest midterm House defeat since 1938. No matter. Obama has proposed a budget with an even larger, $1.6 trillion deficit. That record federal borrowing prompted columnist Charles Krauthammer to describe it as Louis XV indulgence, an allusion to the wild royal spending that brought about the French Revolution. Even Newsweek's Evan Thomas, who once gushed that Obama stood "above the world" as some "sort of God," called the president's new budget a "profile in cowardice." After Obama leaves office, a perfect storm of rising international interest rates, an anemic dollar and panic on the part of foreign lenders may force an end to this unhinged American rush to borrow and blow what it has not earned. Gas prices in many parts of the country are nearing $4 a gallon; it could get even worse as unrest spreads in the oil-exporting Mideast. Yet the Obama administration seems to see no crisis. It has curtailed leases for offshore-oil exploration for seven years and exempted thousands of acres in the West from drilling. It won't reconsider opening up small areas of Alaska with large oil reserves.

Obama's Badger State Blues
Excerpt: President Barack Obama has joined labor's attacks, criticizing Mr. Walker's proposals as "an assault on unions." According to news reports, Mr. Obama's personal political machine, Organizing for America, was thrust into the battle, providing buses to transport striking government workers to the protests, mobilizing phone banks, and rallying protesters from nearby states. Why is the president trying to bully the Wisconsin governor? After all, Arizona, Utah, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and West Virginia are among the states to explicitly prohibit collective bargaining for public employees, which is far beyond what Mr. Walker is seeking. The answer is found in four digits: 2012.

Mexico: Suspect says ICE agent slain in error
Excerpt: Mexican soldiers arrested six men Wednesday who they say carried out last week's ambush murder of U.S. Special Agent Jaime Zapata. The suspects told authorities they believed Zapata and his partner Victor Avila — who was wounded in the attack - to be members of a rival gang because of the vehicle they were driving. Those arrested belong to a cell of the Zetas, the violent criminal gang headquartered in the cities bordering south Texas. Officials identified the group's leader as Julian Zapata Espinoza, alias "El Piolin," or "Tweety Bird," who they said directed a Zeta assassination cell in the state of San Luis Potosi, where Zapata was killed Feb. 15.

Excerpt: Gallup has collected the data from their daily tracking polls throughout 2010 and contrasted the results to the same information from 2009. Not surprisingly, their findings show that Obama has suffered a decline in every state since 2009. His unpopularity is now ubiquitous. Overall, Obama’s national approval rating has dropped 11% from 58% to 47%. Furthermore, the polling data collected from nearly 180,000 interviews shows that Obama is viewed favorably by less than 50% of respondents in 38 states. He is above 50% approval in just 12 states, and is viewed unfavorably by the majority of respondents in 16 states. (The old political adage is still true: “You can’t beat somebody with nobody.” Much will depend on who the GOP nominates, and how the campaign is run. And factors beyond anyone’s control, such as what is happening in the Middle east. ~Bob.)

Former Galesburg mayor barred from using city equipment to clear sidewalks
Fear of the trail Lawyers—crippling America. And if someone slips on the snow covered walks—off to court! ~Bob. Excerpt: For at least 35 years, Gary Allen has used his own equipment to plow Galesburg sidewalks af­ter a snowstorm. Then about four years ago, while Allen was mayor, the city bought a snowblower for about $35,000 so a city employee could clear them. Later, after money for clear­ing the sidewalks was cut from the city budget, Allen went back to using his own equip­ment and doing the work for free. Sometimes, when the snow was too heavy for his equipment, he used the city snowblower. That will no longer be al­lowed, however, after the city attorney advised the council not to allow it. “The attorney told us that it’s a bad idea because Gary is not on the payroll and is not a city employee, and the liability that could rise from that is un­thinkable,” said Mayor Sheila Garrett. “If Gary got hurt or if something flew out from underneath that snowblower and caused an accident or hurt somebody else, he’s not covered for it.”

Excerpt: Federal bureaucrats will write checks totaling more than $3.7 trillion in 2011, paying for everything from alphabetical file folder supplies to zinc-plated radiation shielding. In the process, hundreds of billions of tax dollars will be paid to dead or otherwise undeserving people, spent on materials and products the government doesn't need or already has too much of, handed over to crooks masquerading as legitimate businessmen, or simply lost. But don't take our word for it -- that accounting comes from the government itself. According to the 2010 Financial Report of the United States Government, at least $125.4 billion was thus spent improperly. But that estimate was based on a review of only about $2.3 trillion, thus leaving at least $1.3 trillion unexamined. That means the true amount lost every year to waste, fraud and abuse may well be closer to $200 billion. In fact, according to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, the total could be well in excess of that total because "the federal government is struggling to get control of waste, fraud, abuse and mismanagement in the administrative departments and agencies. Almost two years ago, the Oversight Committee heard testimony from the Chairman of the Recovery and Transparency Board, Earl Devaney, who cited figures from the Association of Fraud Examiners that suggest that U.S. taxpayers lose as much as 7 percent of their government's spending to fraud and waste. If that figure is true, then the federal government lost $228 billion last year alone." A major reason why it is so difficult to know precisely the full extent of waste, fraud and abuse in the federal budget is because the government does not properly account for its spending with a consolidated statement that reflects all outlays, revenues and assets.

Democrats just don't understand the new populism
Excerpt: The Obama campaign and other liberals are looking to tap into the populist current of today's politics and turn the Wisconsin union fight into a national issue in the 2012 election. While the liberals can wield rhetorical pitchforks and light political torches, they should realize that it's their guys who are living inside the castle today. Specifically, public-sector unions -- by many measures the most entrenched special interest in American politics -- are not fighting against The Man, which is to say the entrenched powers of government. In this struggle, The Man is the government unions, which are sitting in the smoky back room divvying up the spoils of a crooked racket. And cronyism -- not wealth -- is the object of today's populist ire. The Left has misread the postbailout populist sentiment all along, assuming public anger was directed at the rich. But American anger, I suspect, is directed not at some people who have money or success, but at those who profit through cronyism and their connections to power. In other words, anti-bailout anger is not anger at the rich, but anger at those unfairly getting rich -- at the taxpayer's expense.

Obama's top funder also leads the nation in White House visits
Excerpt: Just look a different chief executive -- one who talks about taking government back from the special interests: The organization that spent the most to help Barack Obama get elected president: SEIU, which spent $28 million backing Obama. The individual who has visited the Obama White House the most: SEIU President Andy Stern, who has visited 53 times. Also, the company from which Obama raised the most money in 2008: Goldman Sachs, whose CEO Lloyd Blankfein has visited the White House 10 times.
Documentary about the extremists.

Oscars 2011: the terror survivor and the film nominated for an Academy Award
Excerpt: What was supposed to have been the happiest day of Mr Khaled’s life turned to unimagineable tragedy in Nov 2005 when a suicide bomber attacked his wedding party in Amman, killing 27 people, including his father, Nadia’s father and 16 cousins. He has since devoted his life to raising his genial voice and deploying fearless determination to combat the strident advocates of terrorism within the Muslim community. “Osama bin Laden and the people like him always get the airtime when they issue their messages,” he said. “Well, we want to get our message across and give a name and identity to the victims of their terror.” The documentary is the searing and inspiring story of a journey that takes him half way around the world to meet survivors and confront supporters and perpetrators of atrocities carried out in the name of Allah.

Are We Facing 'The West's Last Chance'?
Excerpt: In the first chapter of The West's Last Chance (2005), Washington Times Editor Tony Blankley presents a fictional account of a neck-and-neck political race in 2007 America. Entitled "The Nightmare Scenario," the chapter portrays a presidential candidate, facing polls that indicate an even race and rationalizing to seize an opportunity and secure his dreams for high office. In the heat of a political rally with a Muslim American audience clamoring for shariah law, he capitulates to their demands. In 2005, when the book was published, U.S. political pandering to American Muslims was already an established reality. Since 9/11 and continuing today, our government bends over backward to avoid even a hint of negativity toward the purveyors of Islamic doctrine whose very mission is to destroy us. Pandering to Islam has reached epidemic proportions and threatens our very existence as a free society. This dangerous trend began immediately after 9/11 when President George W. Bush reached out to Muslims, repeating the hollow-sounding mantra that Islam is a religion of peace. This occurred despite prima facie and doctrinal evidence to the contrary. Given that Muslims following the revered Koranic path of jihad had perpetrated (and continue now) the vast majority of worldwide terrorist attacks, the president's message was incongruous with reality. Of course, the silence was deafening from the Allah hu-Akbar ("Allah is Great") corner, which instead focused on fears of burgeoning Islamophobia rather than shared anguish over the loss of life and destruction or condemnation of the hijackers' martyrdom operation.
Public Employee Unions: Entitled to Their Own Views, but Not Their Own Facts
Excerpt: The Center for Union Facts is out with a new, compelling study that makes clear how shoddy is the analysis of the most widely cited pro-union study arguing that public-sector employees are actually underpaid. The study isn't long and should be read in full. But its findings boil down to this: A series of studies released by the union-funded Economic Policy Institute (EcPI) seeks to extend the myth of the undercompensated public employee. Authored by Dr. Jeffery H. Keefe, an associate professor at Rutgers University, the studies examine public employee compensation on a national level, as well as in Indiana, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, and Wisconsin. ... This conclusion does not withstand close scrutiny. In seeking the appropriate comparison point, the EcPI study inappropriately assumes that any state government employee would be just as likely employed in the largest-size private sector firm if they weren't working in the public sector. The study also excludes part-year full-time workers from the analysis, removing a significant portion of the public sector workforce (including one-quarter of all teachers) from consideration. It could be a coincidence that the EcPI study makes two substantial errors, both of which bias the results in its preferred direction. Regardless, what's clear is that when correcting for these omissions and inappropriate assumptions in EcPI's regression, you find that public employees are not underpaid relative to their private sector counterparts. In fact, according to their own analysis, public employees at both the state and local levels enjoy a compensation premium of close to five percent compared to an employee of similar education and experience in the private sector.
Anti-Abortion Billboard in New York Sparks Outrage
Excerpt: An anti-abortion billboard featuring a young black girl and the slogan "the most dangerous place for an African-American is in the womb" has provoked sharp criticism in New York. The poster advertises a Texas-based group called Life Always, which campaigns against what it calls a "genocidal plot" against unborn babies. It is on display in the SoHo area of Manhattan. On its website, Life Always states: "Abortions among African-American women are three times that of the rest of the population. Over 25 per cent of the next generation is being wiped out as we speak". Bill de Blasio, the city's public advocate, described the advertisement as "grossly offensive to women and minorities". "This billboard simply doesn't belong in New York City," said Mr de Blasio. "Common decency demands it be taken down." Christine Quinn, the Speaker of New York city council, said: "To refer to a woman's legal right to an abortion as a 'genocidal plot' is not only absurd, but offensive to women and to communities of colour".

Iran Warships Dock in Syria, Israeli Fears Dismissed
the Trail Run is always peaceful. ~Bob. Excerpt: Excerpt: Coinciding with political turmoil in Egypt and elsewhere in the Arab world, Iran's decision to send warships close to Israeli territory has rattled politicians in the Jewish state. The ships arrived on Wednesday night after passing through the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean, the first Iranian navy vessels to do so since Iran's 1979 Islamic Revolution. Iran's navy commander told reporters the warships were not performing any military exercises but were "on a routine and friendly visit and carry the message of peace and friendship to world countries." "The Zionist regime had been exaggerating this issue because it wants to create tension among the brotherly relations between countries in the region," Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari told state TV.

Obama stays above fray, lets Hill Dems fight GOP on shutdown
What I wouldn’t give to have RINOs in the senate from Nevada, Delaware and a couple of other states. ~Bob. Excerpt: President Obama has been able to keep the partisan battle over a government shutdown at arm’s length, reaping the political benefits of a Senate majority that President Clinton didn’t have in 1995. With a temporary measure to fund the government through March 4 set to expire, Republican and Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill have engaged in an intense back-and-forth over spending cuts and which party is trying to pave the way for a shuttered federal government.

Political Digest for February 24, 2011

I post articles because I think they are of interest. Doing so doesn’t mean that I necessarily agree (or disagree) with every—or any—opinion in the posted article. Help your friends and relatives stay informed by passing the digest on.

Pass this one on: Rhetoric versus Reality
Great short video on “civility” and the Wisconsin situation.

Two-Thirds of Wisconsin Public-School 8th Graders Can’t Read Proficiently—Despite Highest Per Pupil Spending in Midwest
How will they understand death threats from teachers against the governor if they can’t read the signs? ~Bob. Excerpt: Two-thirds of the eighth graders in Wisconsin public schools cannot read proficiently according to the U.S. Department of Education, despite the fact that Wisconsin spends more per pupil in its public schools than any other state in the Midwest.

Gov. Walker on Fake Sick Leave: State Employees will be Terminated, Doctors Investigated
Excerpt: Gov. Walker talks with Sean Hannity about the repercussions of teachers and state employees faking their sick leave with fraudulent doctor's notes. He stressed that the teachers are employees of each individual district and the superintendents can determine what action to take. But state employees are under the governor's jurisdiction.

Great video from Ford about vets

Good column: The city wanted a strongman — and it got one
Excerpt: Yet no matter what you call him, no matter what you think of him, by winning Tuesday's election without a messy runoff, Rahm Emanuel is boss of Chicago. He'll govern that way. It's what was sold. It's what is expected. The thing is, he's smarter than the old boss, more talented, skillful, adept, more focused. If one of Rahm's relatives ever receives $70 million in City Hall pension funds to invest in a real estate deal, he won't be able to say that he didn't know what was going on. No one would believe him. Rahm will begin making moves almost immediately, what with the city's finances in disastrous shape. And he will change minds. This is no game. And becoming mayor of Chicago isn't his last stop. It's one of his first. Rahm's last stop might just be back in the White House, but not as another chief of staff. Don't think it hasn't crossed his mind…. What Tuesday's victory prevents is outside examination of the City Hall books. That lack of scrutiny is what Mayor Richard Daley wanted, after two decades of spending Chicago into near-bankruptcy with all that cronyism and favoritism. Emanuel's victory completes an interesting switcheroo, with Rich Daley announcing his retirement, Rahm stepping down as White House chief of staff, and mayoral brother Billy Daley stepping into Rahm's old job.

Indiana Dem chair confirms: Dems have fled statehouse to stall anti-union push
No one is surprised to find Democrats deserting the post of duty. Wait them out. ~Bob. Excerpt: It's spreading. Democratic state legislators in Indiana have fled the statehouse in an effort to stall anti-union legislation being pushed by Republicans, and they are saying they won't come back until the offending provisions are taken off the table, the Indiana Democratic Party chair confirms in an interview with me. Indiana Dem chair Dan Parker confirmed an anonymously sourced report in the Indianapolis Star claiming that House Dems had fled the statehouse to protest a GOP bill that would "bar unions and companies from negotiating a contract that requires non-union members to kick-in fees for representation," which would limit collective bargaining. "Republicans have decided to bring their Wisconsin assault to Indiana, and we're not going to just sit around and take it," Parker told me, confirming that Dems went "into caucus last night and they remain in caucus today." That phrase means they are "not returning to the floor," he said.

Indiana Democrats trigger Statehouse showdown over anti-union legislation
Excerpt: Seats on one side of the Indiana House were nearly empty today as House Democrats departed the state rather than vote on anti-union legislation. A source tells the Indianapolis Star that Democrats are headed to Illinois, though it was possible some also might go to Kentucky. They need to go to a state with a Democratic governor to avoid being taken into police custody and returned to Indiana. The House came into session twice this morning, with only three of the 40 Democrats present. Those were needed to make a motion, and a seconding motion, for any procedural steps Democrats would want to take to ensure Republicans don’t do anything official without quorum. (The headline seems to have nothing to do with the story. The cowards know there can be no “showdown” if only one side shows up. The now-minority Dems don’t dare vote against the unions, also know they can’t vote for them, and can’t vote “present” without allowing the majority to make the decision anyway. The only solution remaining is to “visit” some other state and pray the Indiana and Wisconsin voters will blame the majority (who stayed) for shutting off the process. I also wonder if Wisconsin could “draft” a few Indiana senators to make up for the Wisconsin senators that also ran for Illinois, or perhaps arrange a trade for an early draft pick in 2012? Our grandchildren will laugh at the stupidity of this if they live long enough.  Ron P.)

Fleebaggers: The New Cut-and-Run Democrats
Excerpt: Voters have spoken: In Wisconsin, Indiana, Ohio and across the heartland, they put Republican adults in charge of cleaning up profligate Democrat-engineered messes. Instead of defending their same old tax-hiking, union-protecting, spending-addicted ways, Democrats are crossing their state borders into big government sanctuary zones -- screaming "la, la, la, we can't hear you" all the way. Wisconsin Democrats warned that their delinquent members -- evading state troopers and literally phoning it in -- could be gone "for weeks" to prevent a quorum on GOP Gov. Scott Walker's modest plan to increase public union workers' health insurance and pension contributions, end the compulsory union dues racket and rein in collective bargaining powers run amok. Big Labor insists its intransigence isn't about money, but about "rights." But the dispute is about nothing but money and power -- the union's power to dictate and limit its members' health insurance choices to a lucrative union-run plan, for example, which adds nearly $70 million in unnecessary taxpayer costs.

Bumper Sticker Suggestion
New Democrat Slogan:
“Run away! Run Away!”

How the Left Sees the Union Crisis in Madison
Excerpt: No wonder that the teacher union protestors in Madison resort to picket signs that depict their elected governor as Hitler, Mussolini or Mubarak. It is far easier to slander their opponent as a tyrant than come up with a serious discussion of how to solve the fiscal crisis facing the state they work in. Because if they did get serious, they would have to start by realizing that the concessions that Governor Walker is asking them to make are both fair and necessary.

Labor unions lining up strike votes if Walker’s bill is approved
All this surprises me. I was expecting the European-style entitlement riots to start in California. In five years, all this will seem like nothing. ~Bob. Excerpt: As the Wisconsin Legislature reconvened this morning, a key federation of nearly 100 labor unions in the state is calling for a general strike for about 45,000 people if Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill is signed into law. The South Central Federation of Labor is calling for a general strike if the bill becomes law, according to a report by The Cap Times in Madison. The SCFL represents workers in 97 unions in Dane, Sauk, Columbia, Jefferson and Iowa Counties. The SCFL website calls for rallies at the Capitol at noon and 5 p.m. today, and for rallies to continue through the week outside and a "constant vigil" inside the Capitol.

Union Bonds in Wisconsin Begin to Fray
Excerpt: Among the top five employers here are the county, the schools and the city. And that was enough to make Mr. Hahan, a union man from a union town, a supporter of Gov. Scott Walker’s sweeping proposal to cut the benefits and collective-bargaining rights of public workers in Wisconsin, a plan that has set off a firestorm of debate and protests at the state Capitol. He says he still believes in unions, but thinks those in the public sector lead to wasteful spending because of what he sees as lavish benefits and endless negotiations. “Something needs to be done,” he said, “and quickly.” Across Wisconsin, residents like Mr. Hahan have fumed in recent years as tens of thousands of manufacturing jobs have vanished, and as some of the state’s best-known corporations have pressured workers to accept benefit cuts. Wisconsin’s financial problems are not as dire as those of many other states. But a simmering resentment over those lost jobs and lost benefits in private industry — combined with the state’s history of highly polarized politics — may explain why Wisconsin, once a pioneer in supporting organized labor, has set off a debate that is spreading to other states over public workers, unions and budget woes. There are deeply divided opinions and shifting allegiances over whether unions are helping or hurting people who have been caught in the recent economic squeeze. And workers themselves, being pitted against one another, are finding it hard to feel sympathy or offer solidarity, with their own jobs lost and their benefits and pensions cut back or cut off.

Quote
Government is the great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else. -Frederic Bastiat, French Economist (1801-1850)

Important: It's Never Just the Economy, Stupid
A sobering recitation of the grimly matter-of-fact examination of the things that are facing us in these troubled times. --Del. Excerpt: WE ARE OFTEN TOLD that we possess the most powerful military in the world and that we will face no serious threat for some time to come. We are comforted with three reassurances aimed at deflecting any serious discussion of national security: (1) that Islam is a religion of peace; (2) that we will never go to war with China because our economic interests are intertwined; and (3) that America won the Cold War and Russia is no longer our enemy. But these reassurances are myths, propagated on the right and left alike. We believe them at our peril, because serious threats are already upon us. Let me begin with Islam. We were assured that it was a religion of peace immediately following September 11. President Bush, a good man, believed or was persuaded that true Islam was not that different from Judaism or Christianity. He said in a speech in October 2001, just a month after the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon: “Islam is a vibrant faith. . . . We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” But unfortunately, Mr. Bush was trying to understand Islam as we would like it to be rather than how countless devout Muslims understand it. Organizationally, Islam is built around a belief in God or Allah, but it is equally a political ideology organized around the Koran and the teachings of its founder Muhammad. Whereas Christianity teaches that we should render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s—allowing for a non-theocratic political tradition to develop in the West, culminating in the principles of civil and religious liberty in the American founding—Islam teaches that to disagree with or even reinterpret the Koran’s 6000 odd verses, organized into 114 chapters or Suras and dealing as fully with law and politics as with matters of faith, is punishable by death.

Voices of Moderation by Thomas Sowell
Excerpt: Moderation -- at least verbal moderation -- is suddenly in vogue.
President Obama's rhetoric has moderated, even if his policies and practices have not. Among Republicans, voices of moderation are warning that the party cannot win elections without having a "big tent" and reaching out to Hispanics, for example. Recently, talk show host Michael Medved has suggested that Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin should moderate their attacks on Obama. Moderation is fine -- if it is not carried to extremes. But some moderates seem to think that it is always a good thing to tone down your words. Yet history shows that muffling your message can mean forfeiting many a battle to extremists. No one has had more of a mixed and muffled message than Senator John McCain, which is why Barack Obama is President of the United States. Republican moderates warn their fellow Republicans that they need to move away from the Ronald Reagan approach, in order to attract a wider range of voters. But Ronald Reagan won two consecutive landslide elections -- and he couldn't have done that if the only people who voted for him were dedicated conservatives. What Reagan had was a clear, coherent and believable message. Even voters who did not agree with him 100 percent could respect that and prefer it to the alternative.

New clashes reported in Tripoli; U.S. citizens to evacuate
Excerpt: Heavy gunfire was reported in Tripoli Wednesday, as anti-government demonstrators clashed with loyalists of Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi. The longtime dictator is vowing to "fight until the last drop of my blood" to maintain his 41-year hold on power, and has called on supporters to reclaim control after a week of rebellion that has left his government's authority in tatters.

Sen. John Thune won't run for president in 2012
Excerpt: South Dakota Republican Sen. John Thune has decided not to run for president in 2012, saying he wants to remain in the Senate to fight for conservative principles. "There is a battle to be waged over what kind of country we are going to leave our children and grandchildren, and that battle is happening now in Washington, not two years from now," Thune said in a statement. "So at this time, I feel that I am best positioned to fight for America's future here in the trenches of the United States Senate." Thune had been weighing a run for national office for months. He recently spoke at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, a gathering widely regarded as one of the first cattle calls of the 2012 fight.

NCPA Expert: Mideast Unrest Is Not the Only Cause of High Oil, Gas Prices
Excerpt: The ongoing turmoil throughout the Middle East highlights the continuing and pervasive vulnerability of the U.S. economy to oil price instability, yet the Obama administration continues to thwart any efforts to increase domestic oil production, according to National Center for Policy Analysis (NCPA) Senior Fellow H. Sterling Burnett. "We have billions of barrels of oil just waiting to be accessed, yet the Obama administration has thrown one roadblock after another to prevent new domestic production," Dr. Burnett said. "These actions have made it nearly impossible to tap new domestic reserves." Overdependence on supplies of oil from what are now increasingly unstable regions of the world throw into stark relief the need to develop our own domestic reserves of oil, Burnett explained. "Even after the Horizon oil blowout, offshore oil production is safer for the environment, and better for domestic job creation and energy security than increased imports," Burnett continued. "While it's true that full access to the U.S.'s existing reserves will not make us energy independent, it will make us less dependent and less vulnerable to foreign supply disruptions." 

Revisiting the Value of Elite Colleges
Excerpt: A decade ago, two economists — Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger — published a research paper arguing that elite colleges did not seem to give most graduates an earnings boost. As you might expect, the paper received a ton of attention. Ms. Dale and Mr. Krueger have just finished a new version of the study — with vastly more and better data, covering people into their 40s and 50s, as well as looking at a set of more recent college graduates — and the new version comes to the same conclusion. Given how counterintuitive that conclusion is and, that some other economists have been skeptical of it, I want to devote a post to the new paper. The starting point is the obvious fact that graduates of elite colleges make more money than graduates of less elite colleges. This pattern holds even when you control for the SAT scores and grades of graduates. By themselves, these patterns seem to suggest that the college is a major reason for the earnings difference.

Market-Based Medicaid Reform
Excerpt: Incremental policy changes are not sufficient to address the projected doubling of Medicaid costs every decade. Reform must be carefully designed to ensure against recreating the same problems that have plagued Medicaid since its inception: rising caseloads and mandated benefits, says the Texas Public Policy Foundation (TPPF). The TPPF proposes dramatic reforms to the way medical care and services are provided to low-income individuals in Texas, under a new assistance program: TexHealth. TexHealth offers a starting point for the discussion of reforming Medicaid into a free market-based program. TexHealth would change the dynamic of Medicaid from a defined benefit program to a defined contribution program, allowing individuals to make their own decisions in regards to their health insurance needs. A defined contribution program will not only allow better access to health care, but allow Texas to subsidize individuals earning up to 175 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL). TexHealth would subsidize the costs of purchasing health insurance in the private market, basing the amount of the subsidy on a sliding scale tied to the individual's income and assets. Under a defined contribution plan, TexHealth will provide better access to health care services and be available to potentially 4 million more individuals than currently served, for less money.

The 19 Percent Solution: How to balance the budget without increasing taxes
Excerpt: Here’s an appalling snapshot: During fiscal year 2010, which ended on September 30, the government spent around $3.6 trillion, or 25 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), while collecting $2.1 trillion in tax revenue, or 14.5 percent of GDP. The resulting deficit was $1.5 trillion. The total debt held by the public—the sum of all accumulated annual deficits and interest payments—reached 63 percent of GDP.
You have to go back to 1946, in the immediate aftermath of World War II, to find spending that was as large a percentage of GDP. You need to return to 1945 to find a deficit that big on a percentage basis as well. Just a few years ago, in 2007, the debt was 36.2 percent of GDP. If current trends continue, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects, the number will reach 87 percent in 2020. Most economists talk about a debt equal to 60 percent of GDP as a trigger point where investors become very nervous about a country’s ability to pay its obligations.

Reforming the Criminal Defense System
Excerpt: Proposals for improvement of the criminal defense system commonly stress the need for more resources and, somewhat less often, the importance of giving indigent defense providers legal independence from the government that funds them. Yet virtually every suggestion for reform takes for granted the feature of the current American system that is most problematic and least defensible -- the fact that the indigent defendant is never permitted to select the attorney who will represent him, say Stephen J. Schulhofer, Robert B. McKay professor of law at New York University School of Law, and David D. Friedman, professor of law at Santa Clara University School of Law. In violation of free-market principles that are honored almost everywhere else, the person who has the most at stake is allowed no say in choosing the professional who will provide him one of the most important services he will ever need. The government's refusal to honor the defendant's own preferences is compounded by an acute conflict of interest: the official who selects his defense attorney is tied, directly or indirectly, to the same authority that is seeking to convict the defendant. With pressure for reform rising and with unprecedented Justice Department interest in new initiatives, it would be a simple matter to institute a voucher plan on an experimental basis in a few federal districts. In particular, defense vouchers will improve the quality of legal representation for the poor. Better legal representation will, in turn, produce at least three benefits to the community, says Schulhofer and McKay: Reduce the likelihood of mistakes -- that is, it will be less likely that innocent persons will be wrongfully convicted of crimes. Minimize adverse consequences to the innocent persons who would have been acquitted under current systems of indigent defense. Bring more complete information to the sentencing phase of the criminal justice system -- making it more likely that just punishments will be imposed on those who are guilty of committing criminal offenses.

Excerpt: I can’t even count the number of articles and blog posts I’ve seen asserting that markets can’t work in health care. Or that they work very imperfectly. Or that they suffer from serious “market failure.” In every case, the writer just assumes that government can remedy these problems. Yet when Gerry Musgrave and I wrote Patient Power, we concluded that our most serious health care problems stem from bad government policies, rather than from markets failing to work. In other words, “government failure” not “market failure” is the source of most of what is going wrong. Why is our perspective so different from so many other health policy analysts? I think the answer is: the vast majority of people in health policy do not understand the concept of “government failure.”

Sharia in the U.S.A.: Christians Jailed for Preaching to Muslims--Dearborn, MI Officials Sued
Excerpt: The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC) announced today that the City of Dearborn, its Mayor, John B. O’Reilly, its Chief of Police, Ronald Haddad, 17 City police officers, and two executives of the American Arab Chamber of Commerce were named as defendants in a ninety-six page federal civil rights lawsuit filed in the Federal District Court in Detroit this morning. The lawsuit, brought by TMLC and co-counsel and Sharia law expert, David Yerushalmi, stems from two separate police actions at the June 2010 Dearborn, Michigan Annual International Arab Festival. Richard Thompson, TMLC President and Chief Counsel, commented, “Muslims dominate the political and law enforcement process in Dearborn. It seems that police were more interested in placating the Mayor and Muslims than obeying our Constitution. Sharia law makes it a crime to preach the Gospel to Muslims. This is a classic example of stealth Jihad being waged right here in America. And it should be a wake-up call for all patriotic Americans.” (Yep, creeping Islamism is alive and well in Dearborn. When people get handcuffed and jailed for even watching someone discuss theology in public, we know that things have gotten truly dangerous. We have to hope and pray that this lawsuit goes the distance and establishes that these actions were in fact wrong and violated the basic rights of Americans, and that the public officials involved will face penalties for their dereliction of duty. --Del)

FBI: Muslim Brotherhood deeply rooted inside U.S.: Terror-support group controls most Islamic groups, mosques in America
Excerpt: Staff investigators with the House and Senate intelligence committees say they are probing the domestic security threat posed by the radical Muslim Brotherhood and, specifically, whether Brotherhood operatives have penetrated the U.S. government. The true nature, ambitions and global reach of the Cairo-based Muslim Brotherhood suddenly have become the focus of debate in Washington, following unrest in Egypt and other parts of the Middle East. As the Muslim Brotherhood threatens to effectively replace Egypt's secular, pro-Western regime, the tentacles of its worldwide jihadist movement have reached deep into the Muslim community in America. Shockingly, federal court documents reveal that virtually every major Muslim organization in America is a front group for the Brotherhood. They also show that its U.S. network has raised millions of dollars for Hamas, al-Qaida and other terrorist groups.

Good Sowell Columns
I was researching a response to a columnist, and came across these older Sowell columns. Worth reading if you haven’t seen them. ~Bob.
Black rednecks and white liberals
Friends’ of blacks

Government Unions Have Not Benefited The Public
They weren’t intended to “benefit the public.” They were intended to benefit public employees, who would in turn benefit Democrats. ~Bob. Excerpt: Excerpt: Government workers were making good salaries in 1962 when President Kennedy lifted, by executive order (so much for democracy), the federal ban on government unions. Civil service regulations and similar laws had guaranteed good working conditions for generations. The argument for public unionization wasn't moral, economic or intellectual. It was rankly political. Traditional organized labor, the backbone of the Democratic Party, was beginning to lose ground. As Daniel DiSalvo wrote in "The Trouble with Public Sector Unions," in the fall issue of National Affairs, JFK saw how in states such as New York and Wisconsin, where public unions were already in place, local liberal pols benefited politically and financially. He took the idea national. The plan worked.

Against Voter Fraud Protests, Worcester Mayor Plays the Race Card
Excerpt: As I reported previously, voting had hardly begun in Worcester, an urban area west of Boston, before word began coming in of questionable activity, mostly centered around community organizing group Neighbor to Neighbor, or N2N. N2N workers were escorting voters in to the polling places and pointing to the boxes on the ballot the voter was to choose. They were accompanying voters in to the booth as “translators” even though the ballots had Spanish translation. (…) While many in the leftist establishment undoubtedly hoped that the events of last November would disappear down the memory hole when the carpets were rolled up after election day, and the volunteers all went back to their day jobs, that simply hasn’t been the case. (As it happens, this is in my backyard (so to speak, it’s actually in the next town over) and I know some of the people involved and named in the article. Within the article is a link to a video taken live during the Election Commission meeting. So much for the new “civility.” These “whining complainers” are just ordinary folks like you and me who watched at the polls on election day, saw potential violations of the law and reported them. It is to the advantage of EVERY American that our elections be honest. While I observed no violations myself—I was about 200 feet from a polling place in my own town holding a sign on that day—I have no reason to think Desiree or the others are being anything other than completely and accurately truthful. To be vilified in this fashion by an elected official is a disgrace to the city of Worcester, and the majority Democrat party. That the local media have all but buried the story simply tells us where they see their bread being buttered. Perhaps a little national attention will shine a light in dark places. Nah, never happen! --Ron P.)

Arizona Muslim who ran over his daughter convicted in honor killing
He was probably confused by all the multiculturalism,” since Islamic law allows you to kill your child. ~Bob. Excerpt: A jury convicted an Iraqi immigrant of second-degree murder Tuesday for running over and killing his daughter in a case prosecutors called an "honor killing." Faleh Hassan Almaleki, 50, also was convicted of aggravated assault for injuries suffered by the mother of his daughter's boyfriend during the October 2009 incident in a suburban Phoenix parking lot, and two counts of leaving the scene of an accident. Prosecutors told jurors during the trial that he mowed down 20-year-old Noor Almaleki with his Jeep Cherokee because she had brought the family dishonor by becoming too Westernized. He wanted Noor Almaleki to act like a traditional Iraq woman, but she refused an arranged marriage, went to college and had a boyfriend.

Two million Egyptians in Tahrir Square chant "To Jerusalem we are heading, martyrs in the millions"
The Religion of Peace, on the march. ~Bob.

Worth Reading: The Post-Western Middle East
Excerpt: There are two phases to recent Arab history. The modern Middle East was an Anglo-French concoction, cooked up by London and Paris somewhat haphazardly after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire. In the waning of British and French imperial power after World War Two, Washington and Moscow stepped into the breach, in many cases replacing sputtering monarchies with strongmen of a secular pan-Arab nationalist bent. Say what you like about dynastic rulers but generally they're beyond ideology: in a sense, a king is his own ideology. When you replace an hereditary monarch with a designated sonofabitch, it's easy to get misled into thinking he represents some force larger than himself. As we now know, Mubarak represented nobody and nothing: Both "Nasserism", the ideology that propped up the regime in its first two decades, and the region's broader post-war secular nationalism were fictions, and unsustainable ones. An hour or so after the dictator fell, I said to Megyn Kelly on Fox that we were witnessing "the unraveling of the American Middle East". That's looking at it from our point of view. Looking at it from theirs, the regimes are belatedly aligning themselves with demographic reality. Across the last half-century, the chancelleries of the great powers invested their effort in maintaining "stability": The result was that governments were superficially stable while their populations wholly transformed - and a huge chasm opened up between an ever more Islamic populace and the regimes they're ruled by. Say what you like about Mubarak but he wasn't into female genital mutilation. Unfortunately for him, his people were - or at any rate the menfolk were. So he banned it. Because he's a dictator, and what he says goes, right? And the net result of that ban is that, on the day he fell, precisely 91 per cent of the country's women were estimated to have undergone FGM: Long before the "Facebook Revolution", Egypt voted with its clitorises.

Obama administration sunk $535 million in Porkulus funds in green-energy turkey
Excerpt: Solyndra, Inc. was supposed to have showcased the effectiveness of the Obama administration’s stimulus and green jobs initiatives, but instead it has become the center of congressional attention for waste, fraud and abuse of such programs. Gosh, who could have predicted that the Solyndra pork project might fail? Perhaps all of those Wall Street investors that avoided Solyndra for one obvious reason: A closer look at the company shows it has never turned a profit since it was founded in 2005, according to its Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings. And Solyndra’s auditor declared that “the company has suffered recurring losses, negative cash flows since inception and has a net stockholders’ deficit that, among other factors, [that] raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a growing concern” in a March 2010 amendment to its SEC registration statement. (More taxpayer dollars down the proverbial rat hole. Not to worry. Obama will just order the printing presses to go to full production mode to make up for the loss. MasterGuns)

US intervention in Libya could cause more harm than good
Excerpt: Libyan dictator Muammar Qadaffi is refusing to step down, and civil war looms on the horizon. Opinions are flying fast and furious over the proper role of the American military and NATO in bringing stability to the region. We should proceed with caution, especially given our shaky moral footing in the middle-east. Undermining protestors by making this an invasion rather than a homegrown revolution could have far-flung consequences. After decades of botched meddling in other nations’ domestic affairs, American foreign policy reached fever pitch during the Bush administration. More often than not, our meddling has resulted in backlash or terrible unintended consequences, from the installation of right-wing dictators in South America, to the Iranian Islamic Revolution. This doesn’t even take into account the various foolhardy wars we’ve stumbled into, from Vietnam to Iraq. So I come at foreign policy from a very cautious position. I’m not quite a full-on pacifist, but I’m close. All that said, reports out of Libya are disturbing to put it mildly - the violence against Libyan protestors is truly horrendous. For all the defections of air force officers and diplomats, there is report after report of slaughter. Qaddafi’s special forces are attacking protestors with snipers, artillery, tanks, and from the sea and air. They are dropping bombs from helicopters. Hundreds are dead, though we have no way of knowing the actual death-toll. I suppose I still come down on the non-interventionist side, no matter how horrible the actions of the Qaddafi government may be.

Get government employee unions out of politics
Excerpt: Wisconsin's Democratic state senators and leaders of the Badger State's government employee unions have given taxpayers nationwide an illustration of the corrupt political bargain at the heart of collective bargaining wherever it is found in the public sector. One side of this corrupt bargain is seen in the fact that public employee unions in Wisconsin contributed more than $130,000 in the 2010 election cycle to Democrats in the state legislature, compared with a mere $8,050 to Republicans. As The Washington Examiner reported last week, nearly half of the Democrat total went to the unions' favorite state legislator in his unsuccessful campaign for lieutenant governor; a victory would have set him up for the governorship. The hard data on campaign contributions don't include significant independent spending by the public-sector unions on behalf of Wisconsin Democrats, nor does it count the value to them of union volunteers licking envelopes, manning telephone banks and doing get-out-the-vote work on their behalf. The other side of the corrupt bargain is the excessively generous, tax-paid compensation and benefits for public-sector employees, approved by the very same legislators who benefited from their campaign contributions. In Wisconsin, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median annual household income -- including families with two incomes -- is $52,000, while the average single-income family brings in only $40,500. By comparison, the average full-time individual Wisconsin state employee receives, depending upon a variety of factors, between $50,000 and $60,000 annually in combined salary and benefits, while contributing little toward either pensions or health insurance.

Public unions force taxpayers to fund Democrats
Excerpt: Everyone has priorities. During the past week Barack Obama has found no time to condemn the attacks that Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi has launched on the Libyan people. But he did find time to be interviewed by a Wisconsin television station and weigh in on the dispute between Republican Gov. Scott Walker and the state's public employee unions. Walker was staging "an assault on unions," he said, and added that "public employee unions make enormous contributions to our states and our citizens." Enormous contributions, yes -- to the Democratic Party and the Obama campaign. Unions, most of whose members are public employees, gave Democrats some $400 million in the 2008 election cycle. The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, the biggest public employee union, gave Democrats $90 million in the 2010 cycle. Follow the money, Washington reporters like to say. The money in this case comes from taxpayers, present and future, who are the source of every penny of dues paid to public employee unions, who in turn spend much of that money on politics, almost all of it for Democrats. In effect, public employee unions are a mechanism by which every taxpayer is forced to fund the Democratic Party.

As Wisconsin and Ohio try to fix their budgets, Illinois banks on a federal bailout
Excerpt: Illinois, which plans to sell $3.7bn of pension bonds next week, may seek a federal guarantee on retirement-system debts if its unfunded liabilities can’t be eliminated, according to budget documents. Illinois's pension plans have an unfunded liability estimated at over 60%, the documents show. Governor Pat Quinn disclosed the potential need for a federal guarantee of pension debt in his $35.3bn general-fund budget on February 16, without going into specifics. Significant long-term improvements will come only from additional pension reforms, refinancing the liability and seeking a federal guarantee of the debt," the document said.