Events, Dear Boys
Excerpt: None of this is a brief for limited government or for expansive government — for a small state or for a large one. It is, rather, a brief for a state with well-defined roles and responsibilities, one that has adequate resources and authority to execute its duties in relation to these. It is in no way contradictory or inconsistent to advocate a settlement under which the national government has no role whatsoever in, say, K–12 education or the management of churches or newspapers, and in which it is very limited in its role in building highways or regulating trade — but at the same time has a great deal of power and authority when dealing with an epidemic or other public-health crisis and a relatively free hand in matters of national security. (This strikes many people as obviously reasonable and unobjectionable, which is why our reflexively sneaky progressive friends are always trying to redefine gun control or climate change as public-health and national-security issues.) It is perfectly defensible to favor a smaller welfare state and a bigger budget for the Centers for Disease Control. But our heroic, god-emperor conception of the presidency prevents the emergence of that understanding of the state. [Williamson almost always makes good points; this article is no exception. I won’t give away his ending in this article, but it’s sobering. “The Random” is hiding in every shadowed place, waiting–lurking–for a chance to bite us when we least expect it. NOTE: this is an NR-Plus article that might be hiding behind a pay wall; if so, readers can view 3 or 4 such articles for free every month (that’s how I see the ones I read). Ron P.]
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment