Dr. Skogstad is a brother Marine and an economist. This short piece just came to me, a few weeks late, but is worth reading. Posted here with his permission. ~Bob
Government
Shutdown—FY 2014
Samuel L.
Skogstad,
Ph.D.
I. What It
Means
The U.S. Constitution requires that an annual budget law
be passed each year to permit the government to spend money in support of its
operations. Like any other law, the budget law must be approved in the
House and the Senate, and signed by the President in order to become law.
But the constitution further requires that spending laws originate in the House
of Representatives. If a budget law is not passed by the house and the
senate, and signed by the President, the Government cannot spend more than it takes
in under existing arrangements, and it cannot spend on new programs or projects
(such as “Obamacare”.) This is what is called “a government shut-down,”
and it is what occurred this October.
II. Who Caused It?
This year, as in each of the past several years, the
House passed an initial budget law and several compromise versions.
President Obama repeatedly announced that there would be no negotiation and no
compromises on the budget he preferred. Democratic Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid dutifully refused to allow a vote in the senate on the compromise
versions offered by the House. No compromise offers were made by the
Senate or the President and none of the House versions was accepted by the
President or the Senate. Once it was clear that the President would
permit no negotiations, the Republican-led House stopped offering compromise
bills. In such cases in the past, there has usually (though not always)
been a last minute agreement on a temporary, “band-aid” measure, passed to
allow continued operations of the Government while negotiations
proceeded. This year, however, that did not happen until the government
had been “shut down” for a few weeks.
This “shut-down,” according to several public opinion
polls, has been blamed by most on Republicans. But it is hard to make
sense of this result. A law requires approval of the House, the Senate
and the President. The House did its job, passing a timely Budget
act. The Senate did not accept it. The House offered several compromises,
giving up successively more of the positions to which the Senate and the
President objected. The President and his Senate obstinately announced they would
neither negotiate nor compromise. Negotiation and compromise are the
essence of Democracy. But the President demanded all or nothing. The
entire episode, almost sure to be repeated in January, is a frightening case of
an arrogant “tyranny of the majority.” Reason dictates that it was caused by
the proudly heralded unwillingness of the majority Democrats to negotiate or
compromise. Only ignorance of the constitution and abhorrence of reason
can support the opposite conclusion.
1 It
is important to note that, during a “shutdown” of government, tax revenue
continues to flow in to the government daily, and that these funds can be
spent. The law provides some flexibility to the President as to which
activities and expenses will be continued and which will be “shut down.”
However when government expenditures are financed in part by borrowing, this
source of funding is subject to a debt limit imposed by the legislative branch.
That limit is expected to be reached tomorrow, October 17, 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment