Book Review Dream Hoarders: How the American Upper
Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else in the Dust, Why That Is a Problem, and
What to Do About It by Richard V. Reeves
My
reaction to this book was “So what?” and “Tell me something I didn’t know.”
Least you think I’m one of those upper middleclass folks who is angry Reeves is
going after me and thinks my kids need to do worse so someone else’s kids can
do better, let me disabuse you. My background and current status is middle to
lower middleclass. My dad was a school teacher who always had a PT job to feed
the family. My step-mom worked PT for a dentist. In high school I lived with my
grandmother for financial reasons, in a one-bedroom apartment. I slept on a
pullout couch in the living room. My wife’s dad was a coal miner. Her mom
helped manage the apartment building they lived in. After high school, I joined
the Marines and volunteered for Vietnam. I earned a BA and an MEd on the GI
bill from state schools. I took the SATs when I was getting out of the Corps,
and my scores were in the 99th and 95th percentile, but I
couldn’t afford private colleges. I had a 31-year professional career, from
which I was forced to retire for a lung transplant in 2013. During the last ten
years of my career, my salary rose enough to put me into the top 20% of
earners. That allowed us to save enough that we have a comfortable retirement,
which will last until we die or the money runs out in 10-12 years. I have never
lived in a house that cost more than $150. My wife had two children when we
married, now in their 40s. Through an endless series of bad decisions, poor
choices and a live-for-today attitude, they are in the bottom 10%, probably
lower. Their combined net worth wouldn’t buy a ten-year-old car. We have two
grandchildren living nearby in their mom’s $5k trailer to whom we try to
provide some enrichment such as dance classes and some guidance, but we cannot
afford to send them to college.
So,
it may be true that the top 20% are getting richer, and that they help their
kids stay in the top 20%. That’s always been true. Reeves states that in 1890,
only 10% of kids 14-17 were still in school, the rest were working. Want to bet
that the 10% mostly had well-to-do parents?
What
matters to me is not how others are doing, but how I and my family are doing.
Economics, as the brilliant black economist Dr. Thomas Sowell has noted, is not
a zero-sum game, even if Reeves and his fellow progressives think it is. It
doesn’t matter if some of the lower 80% get into the top 20%, only how many of
them are rising relative to their own circumstances, not relative to the upper
middle class.
Reeves
solution, as always, is to tax more and throw money at the problem. Never mind
that billions have been spent in the “War on Poverty” and poverty seems to be
willing. Never mind that billions have been spent on the Head Start Program and
that by 6th grade there is no difference between head start students
and other students. But, it can’t be touched, it’s the “rice bowl” for tens of
thousands of administrators and educators.
What
the poor and lower middleclass need are parents that care and the ethics to
succeed. Dr. Ben Carson grew up in the projects, with a single, illiterate
mother. But she made her boys do a book report every week which she pretended
to read. He became the world’s leading pediatric neurosurgeon, though he came
from the bottom 10%.
No comments:
Post a Comment